What it takes to be a Lesbian

October 21, 2018, 3:45 pm

≫ Next: Radical Feminist Disconnect: Lessons in Entitled Inconsistencies

STRAIGHTBIANS have long been under the ignorant Hetsplained idea that being a Lesbian takes two. That being a Lesbian takes a certain age even. That being Lesbian is a duet, instead of a solo.

What is means NOT to be Lesbian vs what it means to be a Lesbian-in pictures:

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

Radical Feminist Disconnect: Lessons in Entitled Inconsistencies

November 15, 2018, 1:45 pm

≫ Next: Time For Another Pop Quiz: Logic 101

≪ Previous: What it takes to be a Lesbian

In writing extensively about STRAIGHTBIANS, particularly Radical Feminist STRAIGHTBIANS, there is an acute disconnect Mrs Dirt and I see LITERALLY LITERALLY (did I say literally yet?) LITERALLY daily, which is the complete and utter disconnect between what Radical Feminist STRAIGHTBIANS claim is impossible for specific others versus what they claim is entirely possible for themselves.

Previously, we have pointed out the double-blind-opposite-sides-of-the-same-coiness between RadFems and Trans persons; today we will delve deeper into the first of many ways Radical Feminists display willful-obtuse-obstinate-Het-privileged-egocentric-illogical disconnect between their own strongly held tenets of faith. Bear in mind, these examples are only a drop in the bucket of an otherwise ocean of idiocy.

Example #1:

Radical Feminist claim 1A: Trans women arent women (meaning males cannot choose to become females). This ad nauseum, poorly worded refrain has been running through RadFem circle jerks for at least forty years. Despite its ubiquitousness each and every time it is uttered on social media/academia it is treated like the discovery of gold amongst beggars.

Radical Feminist conflicting claim 1B: Any woman can choose to become a Lesbian. Equally vomitous and equally plethoric on/in social media/academia; this bullshit claim is the hallmark of Radical Feminism/STRAIGHTBIANISM everywhere.

The disconnect: In claim 1A Radical Feminists clearly understand the biological reality that one sex cannot choose to change into another; not through drugs, not through surgeries, and not through laws. However, in claim 1B biological reality is completely denied in favour of identity politics. Radical Feminists claim to be amazons against identity politics, claim identity politics harm girls/women, yet fail to see the irony of using and abusing identity politics to co-opt Lesbian, claim Lesbian, and commodify Lesbian (a BIOLOGICAL reality verboten to Heterosexuals via HOMOSEXUAL BIOLOGY!).

Privileged Het women claiming Lesbian for various personal or political reasons has been green-lighted by Radical Feminists; while males doing the EXACT same thing to women (privilege also intact) is viewed/treated as RAPE culture! Therefore, if men parading around as ~~women~~ is RAPE, then what the fuck are Radical Feminist parading around as Lesbians?

Radical Feminists have long claimed males masquerading as women (including drag queens) are RAPING woman as an idea; while Radical Feminist STRAIGHTBIANS masquerading as Lesbians are having sexual relations WITH actual Lesbians WITHOUT those actual Lesbians having the knowledge to give INFORMED consent.

That, my friends, is not merely a disconnect, that is FUCKING R A P E!!!!!!!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

Next example in a few days. Stay tuned.

↧

Time For Another Pop Quiz: Logic 101

November 18, 2018, 6:37 am

≫ Next: Lesbians are NOT being forced to CockHold-but Radical Feminists Need Us to be!

≪ Previous: Radical Feminist Disconnect: Lessons in Entitled Inconsistencies

Attention: Straight Females:

Regarding the widespread myth that the only criteria for any female to “magically become a Lesbian” is to have sex with another female, let’s take a quick quiz to test the “logic” of this ridiculous (yet shockingly prevalent) theory:

1).If you have sex with a male, do you magically become a male?

2). If you have sex with someone of another race, do you magically become that race?

3).If you have sex with someone of another nationality, do you magically become that nationality?

4).If you have sex with someone who is (fill-in-the-blank: short, tall, young, old, middle-aged, fat, thin, athletic, clumsy, disabled, non-disabled, etc.), do you magically become that attribute?

5). If you are a perverted, sicko, disgusting freak, and have sex with a sheep, do you magically become a sheep?

As anyone with an IQ higher than fruitcake will quickly ascertain, the CORRECT answer to ALL of the above questions is a definitive “NO”.

Now, let’s do one last question to test the “logic” of our central question:

6).If you have sex with another female, do you magically “become a Lesbian”?

And the answer to #6 is another quite hearty “NO”!

Think about it. Seriously, really THINK about it.

Forget all of the ridiculous radfem rhetoric you have read that supposedly “empowers” women (by encouraging them to be something that they are not — which is not actually very “empowering” after all, now is it?).

Forget all of the salacious soundbites (“Lesbian Murders Lover’s Husband!”; “Lesbian Vampires Kill 2 in Bloodbath!”).

Forget the punchlines of sitcoms, forget the “Lesbian kiss” between 2 straight characters, forget the “Lesbian” TV series written by Straightbians — forget forget forget forget.

Seriously, just forget it all, forget all of the complete nonsense ever perpetuated about “Lesbians”, forget it, if even for just a moment, and please just THINK. THINK. THINK.

Can you really change your innate orientation?Can you really become something you are not?
The answer is “NO”. Nobody can. Not me, not you, not anybody. We are what we are; and wherever we go, there we are.

Lesbians cannot “become straight”, and straight females cannot “become Lesbians”.

It’s really quite simple, folks:

Do whatever you want, love whoever you want.

But please don’t call yourself “Lesbian” unless you are, in fact, AN ACTUAL LESBIAN.

I have learned the hard way that appealing to any inherent sense of logic, decency, or fairness is a completely lost cause with Straightbians. Straightbians’ deep-seated pathology, their entitled privilege, their barely-under-the-surface desperation, their narcissistic egocentrism, always trumps any sort of ethical principles.

So, Straightbians, don’t do the right thing for me, nor for any other Lesbians, since you obviously don’t give a crap about us (if you did, you wouldn’t be appropriating our lives with your lies) — no, instead, tell the truth for yourself:

Here’s the thing: If you are a straight female who is claiming to be a “Lesbian”, you are not being brave, nor radical, nor feminist: instead, you are a coward and a liar. You can never be your true self by denying the truth about yourself. Straightbian lives are a fragile house of cards, build on the flimsy foundation of an outright lie that they are “Lesbians”. Telling the truth about who you really are is the first step of rebuilding a life based on authenticity rather than unethical lies. It’s way past time for Straightbians of all varieties to stop using “Lesbian” as a shield, as a camouflage, as a costume, as a suit of armor, as a money-maker, as an attention-grabber, as a ticket to internet fame, and as a vehicle for your anger.

Mrs Dirt and Dirt

↧

Lesbians are NOT being forced to CockHold-but Radical Feminists Need Us to be!

December 23, 2018, 6:04 am

≫ Next: STRAIGHTBIANS-The REAL Pressure Trying to Cook Lesbians

≪ Previous: Time For Another Pop Quiz: Logic 101

Due to lengthy dual points I am going to make for this subject, this will be a two part post.

Part 1)

These days it is almost impossible not to run across an idiotic article, tweet or Facebook share without seeing some STRAIGHTBIAN or RadFem STRAIGHTBIAN ranting and raving that Lesbians are being coerced or forced (raped) to have sex with penis intact male trans. Stressing, highlighting and perseverating on the penis aspect, forgetting or ignoring, the obvious MALE biology with or without dick. In truth, there is not a single case of a Lesbian having been coerced or forced (raped) by a male trans, dicked or dickless.

Aside from strident Radfems routinely harassing male trans via playing out their emotionally thwarted brainsick boy/girl schoolyard games, and prior to cross-sex hormones altering Het male trans sexual inclinations toward other men; for sure some male trans are getting off by getting the goats of Radfems/RadFem ilk by turning the inclusion/exclusion tables. But it is clearly nothing more than wanton sensationalism, by both Radfems/various other STRAIGHTBIAN types and male trans. In other words, the story behind the headlines is just that, a story!

STRAIGHTBIANS using this line of attention seeking victim mongering aren't even actual victims of male trans. The Lesbian community these Hets women are claiming is under fire/at war with/under siege from by male trans, doesn't exist, nor has ever existed. While Het male trans retain attraction to women before cross-sex hormone changes take hold, let's be honest, it isn't Lesbians they are fantasizing about having a naked pillow fight with. Heck it isn't even the Radfems or other STRAIGHTBIAN types who have eschewed femininity. It's the hyper Het sexual male fantasies of girl on girl porn. I think it's fair to say the Daly Dworkinites are pretty (or not) effin safe from the lustful eye AND peni of the male trans.

That being said, that being LESBIANS ARE NOT BEING COERCED OR FORCED INTO HAVING SEX WITH MALE TRANS! And the ONLY women saying that we are, are WOMEN! (ie HETEROSEXUALS)

So the real question is, why do Radical Feminist STRAIGHTBIANS NEED to proclaim, preach and proselytize the IDEA that Lesbians are being coerced/forced into sex with male trans? I think the answer lies in the complete and utter failure of Radical Feminism and it's collusion with pedophile John Money's Gender Identity theories. Get rid of constructed (lol) gender and Het women will be equal with men/the brain has no gender. A match made in Hell.

Male trans were smart to adopt that exactly line of thinking, and despite forty some odd years of RadFems meekly/weakly trying to fend off male trans advances, they have instead been beaten at their own game. It wasn't Mary Daly as Woman of the year, it was Bruce Jenner. Radfems cheered Billie Jean's battle of the sexes win against Riggs, but today cry foul play as male trans enter women's sports and win win win. (For the record, we obviously do not agree males should be allowed to complete against females in sports. But we also never believed or pretended males weren't physically by and large stronger than females of similar build.)

Like there suffragette sisters before them, when all their efforts failed to garner women the vote, suffragettes fell back on female victimhood whereby liberal males took up their cause ensuring it's approval. Radfems have repackaged Lesbian (Lesbian has been used by Radfems as a vehicle for their Het women anger toward men) as minority female victimhood (minority being status they cannot use any other way as most are them white). Poor Lesbians are being coerced/forced to have icky straight people sex with male trans cock and idiot liberal men like a Graham Linehan for example are fighting the fight weak Radfems/STRAIGHTBIANS cannot fight themselves.

At least the right to vote was something real and tangible, Lesbians forced to fuck males isn't real at all. Lesbians forced to fuck men is the mental spawn of damaged Het women under Radical Feminism. And frankly if by some glitch in the universe some male trans were too hit on a Dyke, make no fucking bones about it, a Dyke would have ZERO problem saying NO, no matter what name he called us!

It's pretty pathetic that given the majority numbers of Radfems/STRAIGHTBIANS etc, given the years they have been flapping their jaws, and given the minority number of male trans, given the five years male trans have had opportunities in larger society; this seemingly uneven matched battle of the sexes so far is being dominated by the men.

As for Lesbians, none of the above has ever been our fight. We have always been paid equal work for equal pay. We have always worked for what we have. We have always existed in the back pockets of the world. And we will continue to flower in our own soil out of sight in plain sight.

But what we won't do is sit silent as warped damaged sexually abused mentally ill and unstable Het women called Radical Feminist/Feminists/Gender Crits misappropriate Lesbians/Lesbian biology. Despite the growing onslaught of collective Homophobia, Hate, attempted silencing, defamation, calling us men and flat out lies.

Mrs Dirt and I will continue to unSTRAIGHTen Lesbian from the opportunistic hands of STRAIGHTBIANS everywhere.

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

STRAIGHTBIANS-The REAL Pressure Trying to Cook Lesbians

January 6, 2019, 10:30 am

≫ Next: Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS-Settling the Record STRAIGHT pt 1

≪ Previous: Lesbians are NOT being forced to CockHold-but Radical Feminists Need Us to be!

I stated in my last post that Lesbians (and by Lesbians I do not mean STRAIGHTBIANS) have not been in the past, nor are in the present, being coerced/raped by male trans. That does not mean that Lesbians past and present do not deal with heavy pressure/coercion to date women we are not interested in dating. This is an area both Mrs Dirt and I, and Lesbian friends have FIRST hand experience with. Experiences that date prior to the internet and most certainly since the age of global communication.

Believe it or not, both Mrs Dirt and I were once young, shy, naive Lesbians. In those youthful (late teens/early adulthood) exuberance's to meet/friend and perhaps date other Lesbians, we went outside our perspective comfort zones and along with respective Lesbian friends doing much the same; we at different times and different places together, found the same unwelcoming, strange and strangely aggressive/offensive "lesbian" grounds the country over. Hindsight leaves all Lesbians remembering those feelings of going to a "lesbian" event or "lesbian" bar and feeling like you have just purchased a candy bar only to find once you removed the wrapper it is instead a block of wood! Later online experiences would figure similarly.

Besides the strong feelings of continued alienation amid or at "lesbian" events/places, we Lesbians also encountered strong warped ideas held by whom we now know to be STRAIGHTBIANS; that "lesbians" do not/should not "discriminate" against any woman who fancies us BECAUSE that would be "acting like men"! According to "~~lesbian~~" (STRAIGHTBIAN) gospel, patriarchy owns the male gaze that decides how women are attractive, when women are attractive and who among women are attractive. "~~Lesbian~~" (STRAIGHTBIANS) instead center women in their lives, are women loving women (womyn), do not "objectify" women yadda yadda yadda. Which is ironic since Het women (which obviously includes STRAIGHTBIANS) are the most mammoth criminals of judging/cutting down/dissecting other women. But thats another post!

Moving on...

Prior to the internet, good intentioned Lesbians (like ourselves) who ventured into "~~lesbian~~-feminist" groups/book clubs/Potlucks/etc were usually met (despite different times/places in the world) with a range of puke-faced disdain, revulsion, anger, opposition and outright hostility (resulting in a collective permafrost shoulder) for calling out/pointing out such blatant discrepancies as mentioned above, or when trying to elicit a plan of action for whatever the current feminist issue of the moment was. Het women, regardless of the sex they are dating, are usually indirect as a missile without a homing device (but equally deadly) would rarely be clear or directly confrontational toward us menacing Lesbians

Internet "~~lesbian~~ feminist" (STRAIGHTBIAN) forums/spaces were (are) brimming over with verbose
circumlocutory (do you see the pattern?) screed screamed at any Lesbian who dares to fall in love with someone she is shares an attraction with. Lesbians are hit with hefty pressures to date women/womyn/wimmin we have no attraction to. I personally had been involved in shitstorms exchanges arguing for the full agency of Lesbians to date ONLY those to whom we are attracted! Why a STRAIGHTBIAN would want to date someone who has zero interest in them is clearly beyond me, but regardless of their neurosis, Lesbians do NOT have to join them in their nutfuck neverever-womyn-loving-womyn-lands!

Lesbians were and are flat out, full on pressured to date any/every unbalanced STRAIGHTBIAN (hmm unbalanced STRAIGHTBIAN? pardon my redundancy!) who shows us the faintest of interest. And if a Lesbian does not reciprocate that interest, we have been labeled any and all of the following:

Fatphobic
Biphobic
Unfeminist
Men or acting like Men
Misogynistic
Anti-womon
Tools of the Patriarchy
Male gazing
Exclusionary
Unfair
Unenlightend
Politically Incorrect
Body shaming
Pretty privileged
Judgemental

Those labels and more being used in effort to PRESSURE Lesbians to date Het women we have no interest in. In my vast personal experience, I am happy to say most Lesbians stayed the course and dated who they liked. But unfortunately, I personally witnessed slews and slews of STRAIGHTBIANS who fell prey to the pressures of other STRAIGHTBIANS; partner with women whom they were not truly attracted (they are straight after all). Straight women in general worry a great deal about what other women think, STRAIGHTBIANS are no exception. These women ended up in relationships that resulted in unhappiness, unfulfillment, confusion, emotional abusiveness, physical abusiveness, pronoun changes, name changes, cross sex hormone changes, top surgery, bottom surgery, financial devastation, job loss, home loss, possession loss etc!

I find it both convenient and ironic that amid the torrential social media storms regarding ~~lesbians-being-pressured-to-accept-dick~~, not one woman has mentioned these very real pressures on very real Lesbians! But I guess to discuss this topic, you might actually have to at least KNOW a Lesbian! As opposed to knowing only the STRAIGHTBIANS peddling this gibberish.

Lesbians are born a minority. There will always be more of them than us. Our biological nature has equipped us with grit, fortitude and mettle. All working together to keep our trees from bending to the winds and whims of Heterosexuality. Those weighty winds have lost all of us some leaves or even small branch or two, but our stalwart trunk remains strong and our roots deep.

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS-Settling the Record STRAIGHT pt 1

February 6, 2019, 11:53 am

≫ Next: Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS-Settling the Record STRAIGHT pt 2

≪ Previous: STRAIGHTBIANS-The REAL Pressure Trying to Cook Lesbians

Another disturbing area of STRAIGHTBIANISM (along with being Heterosexual and claiming to be Lesbian) is what we call the Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN, not to be confused with actual pedophiles, but bear with.

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS come in primarily two forms, equally sick in their own right.

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A) Internet newsgroups, forums and chat rooms have been overflowing with these types from when the internet was nothing more than bare bones. Every butch-femme (lesbian), BDSM (lesbian) or kink (lesbian) area on the internet past and present is littered with this type of STRAIGHTBIAN. There has been a growing decline in the last dozen or so years tho, as many of these STRAIGHTBIANS have entered into transition and identified as FTM rather than previously identifying as some form of lesbian or gender queer.

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A's engage in playing in child sexual abuse, whereby one STRAIGHTBIAN will pretend to be a child while the other STRAIGHTBIAN pretends to be the child molester. In the cases of Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A's whom claim to be butch-femme, the butch Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A usually assumes the role of the daddy (child molester) while the femme Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A usually assumes the role of the little girl (victim). Among Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A's who do not identify as butch or femme, the role playing may not be so static, whereby the daddy/girl play maybe just one form of their sex scenes and the players might not always assume the same role.

Before any STRAIGHTBIAN readers yell PRUDES, regardless of the circular mental unhealthiness of these pedoesque games that go nowhere and never lead to any kind of child sexual abuse recovery (because wallowing in CSA isnt cathartic, freeing or enlightening), I nor Mrs Dirt frankly care what two consenting adults do in bed, on the floor, on the ceiling or wherever, but we DO care when they are using LESBIAN to do so!

Sexually abused Heterosexual women who spend their adult lives reenacting child sexual abuse is NOT Lesbian! Sex, no matter what form of sex, between two Heterosexual females does NOT make you Lesbian or turn you Lesbian! But it is precisely these narrow minded harebrained biologically driven Hetsplained explanations for the two dimensional lesbian as they (het society)know it (2 females engaging in something sexual).

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A's are yet another area Lesbians desperately must and need to unSTRAIGHTened ourselves from! Medical literature on lesbians for more than a century are replete with linking CSA and Lesbianism, all failing to differentiate between actual biological Lesbians and child sexually abused Het females who engage in sex with other females. (So much easier for Hets to make Lesbian into something that sprang from sickness *sexual abuse* then grew into depravity *rejecting men*, rather than entertain the idea that Homosexuality is a rung up on the evolutionary ladder)

Instead we're suffocating from centuries of lesbian studies (written by Het males/females/STRAIGHTBIANS) stacked to the high heavens babbling Babel that only makes sense to HETEROSEXUALS! A group who unfortunately dominate EVERYTHING due to their sheer numbers alone (intellect optional)! Numbers that invariably decide what we deserve/need based on who we are PERCEIVED to be via incorrect data, ie mentally/emotionally damaged STRAIGHTBIANS (sexually abused straight females)!

In short, what fucked up damaged straight women do in bed with other fucked up damaged straight women who called themselves some form of Lesbian/are labeled some form of Lesbian by other Heterosexuals IS the business of Lesbians BECAUSE their actions/perception of their actions AFFECT Lesbians personally!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS-Settling the Record STRAIGHT pt 2

February 25, 2019, 2:01 pm

≫ Next: The Dirt from Dirt-The Silencing of a Lesbian

≪ Previous: Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS-Settling the Record STRAIGHT pt 1

In this part two of Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS, we will be discussing Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B types.

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B pathology functions, in a sense, closer to that of what we think of as pedophiles, without actually crossing the legal/moral lines of pedophilia. Meaning these particular STRAIGHTBIANS are older adults who prey on younger adults. Legal, but most definitely Creepy with a capital C!

Any Het female with a Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B pathology has most certainly been the victim of child sexual abuse which may have begun early, but definitely ceased around puberty. Depending on when the child sexual abuse stops, the maturity level of Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's will peak and linger around the time the abuse ended. Meaning if the child sexual abuse ends around 12-14 lets say, then no matter the age of the abuse victim reaches, puberty-100 lets say, the maturity level will remain around ages 12-14 (puberty).

Teen romances/sexual experiences post child sexual abuse obviously do not appear problematic, because these relationships fall within what appears to be normal age brackets. But as Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's age, their attractions/romances/sexual relationships continue to be for younger females. Most Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's do not embark on relationships with female teen youths, although there are exceptions (Teena Brandon *Boys Don't Cry* for example:a sexually abused child rape victim multiple times over who turned her anger toward her own sex, by coincidence of a wrong phone call, molested several young teen girls while she was in her early twenties). Most Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's will date/romance other STRAIGHTBIANS whose maturity and/or age are often decades younger.

Again, while STRAIGHTBIANS B's are in their twenties lets say, dating another twenty-something STRAIGHTBIAN may look to a casual observer as innocent, but closer inspection magnifies the differences in maturity ages. What I mean by this is a Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B with a maturity level of a 12-14 year old will be attracted to a STRAIGHTBIAN whose maturity level is that of say an 8-10 year old girl. As Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's age into their 30's and 40's, we find a growing gap into (not just maturity level) the actual years/decades between them at their current soulmate.

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's are unable (what 14 year can) to sustain any serious or long term relationship. Like teen youths, once the freshness and fun is over, its time to move on to greener pastures! They can only impress a much younger woman with coffee dates, social media love pleas and song dedications from their youth before boredom sets in. Even with gay marriage's short legal rights, most Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's have already been through at least one marriage and divorce. Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's are ALWAYS the dominant in the relationship, but unlike Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN A's, they do not fetishise their lead role, they just require it!

Other ways Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's differ from A's is in the dynamic of their relationships.
Older PSB's seek out younger STRAIGHTBIANS who may possess a similar maturity, but their drastic age difference helps to ensure Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's are looked up to, maybe even idolized as an older role model or community leader. In fact, Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B types will work to gain positions that have power/hierarchy because these types of fields/jobs have the potential to impress younger STRAIGHTBIANS. Academia is FILLED with Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B types! Radical Feminism has long been a kind of vanguard for Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B's. LGBT community jobs possess many Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B types as well. But any doctor, lawyer, mental health management, particularly if these positions intersect with LGBT rights etc, all are havens for Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B types. With higher paying careers comes larger salaries, all go to impress/ensnare/buy young, damaged and impressionable younger STRAIGHTBIANS.

Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIAN B types are another rancid sect of STRAIGHTBIANS rotting the core of perceived Lesbian. Unfortunately for real Lesbians, they are another noxious weed choking out our flowering at the root.

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

The Dirt from Dirt-The Silencing of a Lesbian

March 26, 2019, 7:51 am

≫ Next: UnStraightening Lesbian: Removing the Heterosexual Lens Next Series

≪ Previous: Pedoesque STRAIGHTBIANS-Settling the Record STRAIGHT pt 2

A recent tweet alerted me to yet another area of bowdlerization.

STRAIGHTBIAN voices dominate and make up the whole of "~~lesbian~~" history; past and present. Trans voices (mostly male) dominate all other areas of recent "queer" histories. All are given free reign in universities, media/media reports and social media (except where they clash with each other). A Lesbian voice? Even a single one, MUST be SILENCED! What is it exactly about us is that that they are so very very afraid?

dirt

↧

UnStraightening Lesbian: Removing the Heterosexual Lens Next Series

April 18, 2019, 12:10 pm

≫ Next: STRAIGHTBIAN CrackPOT Julie Bindel Calling Out Queer Kettles!

≪ Previous: The Dirt from Dirt-The Silencing of a Lesbian

After a bit of a hiatus, we are back with the next sect of STRAIGHTBIANS in our UnSTRAIGHTening Lesbian series. In this series we will be unSTRAIGHTening:

Elizabeth Lapovsky Kennedy andMadeline Davis.

Both are noted for a joint ~~lesbian~~ herstory project called Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: A History of the Lesbian Community. Kennedy and Davis had the typical academic STRAIGHTBIAN paths; dated/married men, dump men in favour of Feminism, garner a degree/career to Hetsplain Lesbian to one and all, including actual Lesbians, all the while not knowing or caring about who actual Lesbians are or how vastly our experiences differ to that of Hets/STRAIGHTBIANS. From Slippers:

What Kennedy and Davis explored were STRAIGHTBIANS playing at THEIR heterosexual biology/notions of Lesbian based solely on Heterosexuality.

Next up will be Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon.

Martin and Lyon like most academic STRAIGHTBIANS, dated men, were academically inclined, chose to partner with each other, then spent their lives trying to Hetsplain Lesbian away from the mire other STRAIGHTBIANS defined it as. From their book Lesbian/Woman:

A few putrid drops in the bucket of their Homophobic Hetsplained book. Martin and Lyon struggled to remove Lesbian from its biological origins in order to explain their wrongful occupation!

Next in the group is Julia Penelope.

JP describes herself as "white, working-class, fat butch dyke who never passed", which loosely translates to a man-hating white Het woman who feels she is too fat to claim she is feminine. JP is a ~~lesbian~~ STRAIGHTBIAN academic separatist, who utilized academic gobbldeygook to justify why she claimed to be a Lesbian. A few choice quotes from JP:

JP had zero qualms about ~~constructing~~ Hetsplaining Lesbian!

Like many STRAIGHTBIANS before her, JP was nauseated by actual homosexuals and set about linguistically distancing herself from us.

JP is right about one thing, biology DOES determine how sexually abused Het women occupy Het ideas of Lesbian.

And last in this new series is Audre Lorde.

It is clear from the outset Lorde was no Lesbian, but in fact positively a STRAIGHTBIAN. Lorde enjoyed sex (both casual-resulting in illegal abortion-and serious) with men (she was married for nearly a decade) and other STRAIGHTBIANS.

Like many STRAIGHTBIANS, Lorde was hyper sexual and morally bankrupt regarding women.

With this next group Mrs Dirt and I will continue to brick by brick display the historical wall of STRAIGHTBIANS that continue to hide actual blood and bone Lesbians, in favour of Hetsplained flapdoodled Homophobic hogwash comprehensible to Heterosexuals!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

STRAIGHTBIAN CrackPOT Julie Bindel Calling Out Queer Kettles!

April 28, 2019, 8:39 am

≫ Next: Stephannye Paola Castro Mora Was NOT Wearing Nor Forced to Wear a Dress!

≪ Previous: UnStraightening Lesbian: Removing the Heterosexual Lens Next Series

An outraged (rightfully so) reader sent this yesterday; a plea made by bats in the belfryJulie Bindel (oh Jules!):

By "lesbians" Jules clearly means STRAIGHTBIANS who stick with STRAIGHTBIANS and only fantasize about "the menz" while diddling themselves, they dont actually fuck men, or at least only do so when not a soul is looking. But rest assured, WE SEE YOU!

It is pure unabashed irony that the Julie Bindel's of the world fail and fail and fail again to see their own deformed logic, or rather their Heterosexual logic (sex sex sex). Mrs. Dirt and featured Jules in part of our unSTRAIGHTening Lesbian series here: UnStraightening Lesbian: Removing the Heterosexual Lens: Julie Bindel. Jules has no trouble vomiting shit like this:

Denial is the cornerstone of STRAIGHTBIANISM, so, of course, Jules isnt convinced; she cannot afford to be. Jules blithely ignores the 99.9% of her cognitive operation/behaviour that is Heterosexual, and instead CHOOSES (her words), to make the .1% (sex with other STRAIGHTBIANS) her life's focal point, including her bread and butter which her little ranty plea is all about. Not comprehending that even THAT .1% (sex with other STRAIGHTBIANS) is also
H E T E R O S E X U A L!

Jules, hun, babe, sweets, you could lick every single pussy on planet Earth, from time immemorial and as a biological Heterosexual female? You are still a Heterosexual female. Look: I know, trust me: it is difficult for Heterosexuals to get beyond their Heterosexuality, beyond that sex sex sex sex sex drive driving you all toward babies babies babies. And yes, even those STRAIGHTBIANS who do not have children, they still use that biological drive toward children via sex, including sex with women. But Homosexuality is not simply who you have sex with Jules, we werent fucking our mothers in the womb, although that bizzaro world trying to get back to mommy's cunt does seem to be another characteristic shared by many a feminist ~~lesbian~~ STRAIGHTBIAN like yourself.

But I digress, it is pretty fucking deplorable to see STRAIGHTBIANS whingeing because other not as STRAIGHTBIAN STRAIGHTBIANS are getting media successes that they arent! It makes no difference whether these STRAIGHTBIANS "claim" to be "queer", they, like you ARE queer!

Queer. by the way, Jules, isnt something Lesbians took back, and now Heterosexual freaks have stolen as their own, it has ALWAYS been THEIR and YOUR own. NOT ours! Dykes were not, and are not, marching in the streets screaming with we're here we're queer signs. Lesbians do not need signs! Not in the past, not now, and not in the future! WE announce our Homo nature in our first words spoken, our first steps taken, LONG before our first kiss!

WE are not no-platformed, because no one would ever give an actual Lesbian a platform to be taken away.
WE are not fighting for abortion rights.
WE are not worried about the plight of Hookers.
WE are not wasting our time at conferences and workshops so that we can mirror the Heterosexual idea of Lesbian back and forth to each other in great desperateness in order to strengthen a weak and damaged ego system.
WE dont love all women. (And: frankly, neither do you)
WE arent fighting off the male gaze by sporting a STRAIGHTBIAN conceive uniform.
WE arent eschewing femininity!
WE dont blame patriarchy (if not familiar, think God) for all problems.
WE arent sitting in a circle with mirrors nude, looking at our vaginas.
WE do not and have never needed feminism (special rights for straight women).
WE have nothing in common with Het females of any age.

WE live being fully misunderstood and abhorred (including allies) by Heterosexuals of both sexes, having more in common with males of both sex types, and if we're lucky (as I am) marry another Lesbian; or better still (as it is for me) marry another Lesbian who is the Lesbian of our waking and sleeping dreams.

In other words, Bindel: you arent a fucking Lesbian and neither are the cunts you are crying about! At the end of the day Bindel's little whinge is nothing more than:

Cheers
dirt

↧

Stephannye Paola Castro Mora Was NOT Wearing Nor Forced to Wear a Dress!

May 8, 2019, 12:52 pm

≫ Next: After Ellen Goes After its Lesbian and Bisexual Readers in an Open Letter-It is NOT Pretty

≪ Previous: STRAIGHTBIAN CrackPOT Julie Bindel Calling Out Queer Kettles!

A few nights ago Mrs Dirt asked if I had seen the copious Social Media cross postings from STRAIGHTBIANS everywhere about the lesbian forced to wear a dressthen murdered. (Apparently the victim did not like nor own dresses.) I had not. She then showed me a blog post and various conversations on several different Social Media platforms. Like her, the whole forced to wear a dress thing seemed WWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY out there to me! I mean, the logistics alone! But as it was right before bed, the conversation was left till we could both delve further.

Yesterday when I had more time I did indeed check further, and found out immediately that Mrs Dirt was in fact exactly right, the victim (Stephannye Paola Castro Mora) had not beenforced to wear a dress then murdered/butchered. The clothing found near her torso (Miss Mora had been dismembered) were her own clothes (shirt/shorts).

While Miss Mora's murder is an absolute horror and a tragedy from which her loved ones will forever grieve, it was puzzling how such a bizarre inaccuracy (forced to wear a dress) came about and then taken on a whole new life (if you will) of its own. Being curious as to how such a CRAZY prevarication came about, I checked a little further in the stories surrounding Miss Mora's death.

The first reports of an unidentified female body/parts were on Nov. 7th 2018:

No mention of clothing, dresses or anything else. The victim was identified the next day, Nov. 8th 2018:

On Nov. 9th there is an article that mentions "women's clothing", this was likely extrapolated from police the day prior when trying to identify the victim, gave a brief description of her clothes as a blouse and shorts. The police who see a female torso arent trying to trace which section of a clothing store the victim purchased their clothes in, the men's section or the women's. They are giving a basic description to the public of what was found with the victim for the purpose of identification. Also first mentioned in this article (but far from the last) Miss Mora's association with Teresa Mendoza.

It seems from this point things quickly snowball and on Nov. 13th 2018, a congress woman makes a public statement that Miss Mora was put in a dress before being murdered in order to humiliate her:

One would suspect that the dress thing/Lezbophobia/hate crime slant was generated as much by Miss Mora's family as idiots on Social Media. Her family no doubt preferred the hate crime scenario to the drug dealing one:

At this point the police further clarify that Miss Mora was NOT wearing a dress:

Clearly the police have gathered sufficient evidence from Miss Mora's home that ruled out her being murdered over her sexual relations or fashion sense. Her missing cell phone continues to be a much desired piece of evidence the police are VERY interested in.

It is pretty clear, with just the least bit of minimal effort to discover that Miss Mora was NOT in fact wearing a dress when her torso was discovered, nor forced to wear a dress then executed.

THERE WAS NO DRESS!

So why are literally hundreds of US and UK Radical Feminists and STRAIGHTBIANS alike desperately clinging to this warped, demented and incorrect metastasized fabrication? Why has frenzied hysterics trumped all sense of reason and common sense with these women? Do they actually believe some man or men decided to find a woman they thought was a lesbian, kidnap her, measure her and then go to a women's clothing shop, pick out a dress, bring it back to wherever they are keeping her, point a gun to her head and say "put the dress on or die bitch"? (Most Dykes would die, lets be real) Then stand around her and laugh, then put a bullet in her head, dismember her and toss her body parts across town? Get fucking real!

In the entire history of Lesbians, this lunatic scenario has NEVER happened. Why do these Het women need this woman to be more of a victim than she already is? Why do they (Het women) need her to be a lesbian humiliated and victimized by patriarchy? Because victimization is the only way Het women (STRAIGHTBIAN or otherwise) can identify with a presumed lesbian?

Y E S!!!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

After Ellen Goes After its Lesbian and Bisexual Readers in an Open Letter-It is NOT Pretty

July 3, 2019, 2:58 pm

≫ Next: Andrea Dworkin-Intercourse-an Interpretive Dance

≪ Previous: Stephannye Paola Castro Mora Was NOT Wearing Nor Forced to Wear a Dress!

Yesterday Mrs Dirt ran across this article (An Open Letter to the Lesbian Community About Funding Projects) that was retweeted on Twitter, from the self identified "lesbian and bisexual" owned and operated website afterellen.com.

The article begins:

Dear lesbians and bisexual women: we need to talk. There’s a problem for our community on the horizon that we need to address. The problem is this: we’re not doing enough to put money into lesbian projects.

After this initial chiding the article continues:

Time and again, we say that we want more representation: more movies, more TV characters, more web series, more books, more graphic novels, more lesbian-only spaces, etc. If we want these things, we have to pay for them.And right now, we’re not doing a good enough jobto save the things that we want. If we don’t step up, we’re going to lose some of what we have...

AfterEllen goes from chiding to a full out, full stop autocratic parental shaming tirade on how "lesbians and bisexuals" are not doing enough and need to do a better job with their hard earned dollars if they want ~~mommy and mom~~...err afterellen.com to reward them with new and exciting gifts from the gods or goddesses or else!

After warning, yelling, threatening and shaming, AfterEllen continues in mommy mode, but switches from mean mommy to nice mommy on bent knee (so they're eye level) with "lesbians and bisexuals" explaining why they need to do better with their money:

But everyone got so used to free content on the Internet that now they expect it and will refuse to pay for content. As a result, professional websites (that is to say, not personal blogs) are struggling, trapped between the need to make money in order to continue running their business and the unwillingness of their users to chip in and make up for lost ad revenue.

Despite intently searching AE and the general internet, I failed to find a statistic on how many AE readers refused to pay or were unwilling to donate. If the sites owners have such numbers available I'll be more than happy to edit to add.

Also the "lost ad revenue" remark here is particularly offensive. Apparently according to the gals at AE, "lesbian and bisexual" readers are to blame for and I quote "LOST AD REVENUE"! Lost Ad revenue would actually fall into the domain of those responsible for the domain, ie the owners (Memoree Joelle with AE since 2016 and Gaye Chapman) along with anyone THEY hired to do their PR and managing work, not the poor readers!

AE goes on and interestingly quotes themselves by saying:

The highlighted writing in red (theirs not mine) makes a bold statement by AE, disbelieving straight media "that lesbians have less disposable income"by saying that may be a minor factor BUT "that can’t be the full story"!!!!

The truth is, lesbians and bisexual women will contribute financially to things on an ad hoc basis.

AE then goes on to cite several times where "lesbians and bisexuals" raised or donated money for specific topics of interest. Stating basically while some "lesbians and bisexuals" may not be loaded, they will still FUND projects they believe in.

Lesbians might not have much money compared to other demographics, but they can be very generous with what little they do have.

The article ends on particularly insulting and foul odorous note, further insulting their readership by calling them freeloaders!

We can’t freeload on positive externalities forever.

But it wasnt so long ago AE tried to shred the as they called it Television’s Rich Lesbian Problem. Breaking down the myth of LWord90210 portrayals of "lesbians and bisexuals" versus real life poverty stricken "lesbians and bisexuals". Citing various studies:

24% of gay women were living in poverty
lesbian/gay/bi women (their classification) are statistically likelier to be in poverty
29.4% Bisexual and lesbian women were still likelier to be poor
Rurality further compounds the likelihood of poverty among lesbians
40% of homeless teens (are) gay and lesbian youths

There are certainly many wealthy lesbian and bi women, but we occupy the lower end of the financial spectrum with frightening regularity. Even if she is privileged in other ways (white, able-bodied, neurotypical, etc.), a gay woman has the financial odds stacked against her.

Aside from AE's own researched post linked above detailing "lesbians and bisexual" poverty, a mere Google search brings up a plethora of studies detailing the same:

Clearly by AE's own admission in the above article, "lesbians and bisexuals" are more poverty stricken than most, and have less disposable income, granted this article was written prior to

Meanwhile a few days (end of February 2019) prior to announcing the acquisition of AE by Memoree Joelle and Gaye Chapman:

AE was sponsoring LUXURY YACHT cruises according to their Twitter account!

A few days later:

Wow! According to AE's current owners, I quote CHAMPAGNE FLOWING NOW!

A few days after that:

At least one member of the "lesbian and bisexual" duo feels quite comfy hashtagging herself an "entrepreneur"!

And since the article's author Karen Frost boast in her AE bio that:

My favorite city in the world is Paris, but Tanzania is the best vacation destination and Bangladesh will always be where my heart lies because of my time living there.

Given Miss Frost has stayed on and continues to write for AE, we can only assume she is still being paid huge wages in order to afford such extravagant vacations!

And least I also make mention, AE's own policy of:

Clearly AfterEllen has and sells space to advertisers, which the initial article blamed "lesbians and bisexuals" for "lost ad revenue". So between the current acquisition of AE by Memoree Joelle and Gaye Chapman; luxury yacht cruises, flowing champagne and unknown marketing strategies to potential advertisers, the sites owners/staff are blaming "lesbian and bisexual" readers for their own empty coffers!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

ps This blog has been operating since 2008 and guess what? ITS FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
pps For a small fee places such as GoDaddy can house all your "lesbian and bisexual" readership needs! No sponsors necessary and no having to pander to sponsors.

↧

Andrea Dworkin-Intercourse-an Interpretive Dance

July 11, 2019, 2:48 pm

≫ Next: Andrea Dworkin-Intercourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 3 & 4)

≪ Previous: After Ellen Goes After its Lesbian and Bisexual Readers in an Open Letter-It is NOT Pretty

In this post we will examine the first 2 chapters of Intercourse.

Chapter 1-This book literally begins from 0 and goes STRAIGHT to 100 in no time flat! Hold on to your hats ladies, this is going to be a bumpy ride! Yee-Haw!

This book is not kidding, talk about MAYHEM!

Wow! Kinky and thought provoking!

It had me at buy 5 and get 3 free!

A "few inches"? "Deeper and wider"? Oh MY! Berserk is spot on!

I couldnt tell if Miss Sunshine loved Dick or water sports or both! Oh yes she did! What a page turner!

Monsters, Satan, rapists AND shorter shorts? We couldnt put this book down! (Fans self)

Chapter 2 only got wilder! This chapter really broke down "sexual intercourse" and pants shitting in one fell swoop! Brilliant feminist analysis!

Virgins, Warriors, Queens, traps and holes with only a single exit! Oh my, oh my!!! Skinless indeed, I felt chapped just reading this chapter!

This page challenges Het women to "ignore the man" as well as illustrating the internal process Het women hold "How can I?"! And yes, it certainly did "blow my ass" and my mind!

OMG and yes, there is something "terribly wrong" here. How have we missed it! Het women and their sexuality, Het women creating "butch and femme identities" in order to make sense of their same sex attractions! Wow! Fantabulous academic analysis and rigour!

..."skinless and naked"...the only love story here is between us and this book! Somebody call the fire department!

I liked how here the radical feminist message that Het women are weak and passive is both laughed at and something to scream about. Thought provoking to say the least!

"The future was already here"! Bang on right! Like a slap in the face, a blaring alarm clock ringing in your ears! Of course, there is no progress among the sexes because today is born of yesterday! Genius, maven even!!!!

I really enjoyed the disjointedness of this part of the book. How it weaves from sexual innocence to declaring intercourse itself as rape! Basically shoving (raping?) the old notion (you cant rape the willing) down the throat of patriarchy! Holy shit Bob!

By the ending of chapter two, I swear we were jumping, playing and loving with her!

And thats just the first two chapters! Stay tuned for our discussion of chapters 3 and 4 coming soon!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

Andrea Dworkin-Intercourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 3 & 4)

July 15, 2019, 1:56 pm

≫ Next: Andrea Dworkin-InterCourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 5 & 6)

≪ Previous: Andrea Dworkin-Intercourse-an Interpretive Dance

Chapter 3 of Intercourse wastes no time, at once highlighting the evils of pornography while simultaneously temping us with the compulsion of "sweaters, skirts, shirts, and underthings"! Riveting!

Right into the second page of chapter three "why we lie", is this a question or a statement or both? Is the "embellished" patriarchal "fantasy" real? Is "dreamland" the only safe space for Barbara (who the fuck is Barbara?) amid "vagabond men in cheap hotels"??? Or is this all some crazy metaphor for Het women using fantasy as an escape from the real/patriarchy and men using fantasy to sexually collide with the real? Hmmmm...

The next page BEGINS with a climax, smacking of postmodernism, talk about on your head brilliant! It then does a fast sprint through weak flesh, longing, blessed and introspection all culminating into a seeming bizarre question about imagining a "middle-aged Chinese lady...from the past"! What??? Is this comment on sex, power, intersectionality or all of the above? Colour me intrigued!

I like how this page sharply focuses on "she", her "nervous laugh"her "hidden" hysteria, her"stigmatized excitement" and "uncompromising passion"! We dont know who "she" is. Is this a "wicked" dream of "Paula's", "sexy, weird and banned"? I dont know. Is Paula among the people in the picture? What happened to Barbara? So many unanswered questions!

The Winston Churchill quote at the beginning of chapter four is a profound choice in my humble opinion. I'm still grasping the unplumbed gem regarding nakedness! The Kafkaesque K in AmeriKa was not lost on me, the "cottage cheese" reference might be, but wives wanting their husbands to fuck God? OMG! Brilliant subtle poetic genius that almost slips by and then BLAM, God is a woman! HOLY fuck!

This page stripped it down to the "bare junk"! An exemplification of how Patriarchy used the act of procreation to destroy the language surrounding sex in order to give birth to "rape, pornography, and prostitution"! Then going further by depicting the power imbalance and racism of a "white woman" who tortures "James" a "black musician". Emphasizing white women's internal Patriarchal drive/lust to garner power (for themselves) over less dominant cultures; but more specifically here, smashing feminist lies about men and power by showing us WHITE women's power over men in less dominant cultures! I was breathless after this page I swear!

I read the next two pages as a dual piece, but will critique them separately. This is a very RAW and visceral piece that centers "fucking" at the center of the universe, giving us a different take of the Big BANG Theory! But wait, it doesnt stop there, we go from the immensity of the universe down to the needle point of one individual "street boy" whose "sordid" duties get "wiped clean" between the sheets. Brilliant to use a male prostitute to represent the w/hole of Heterosexual female relationships with men! Pointing out through the use of a doppelgänger that Het women's lives may be messy, sordid and squalid but when a man is fucking them, in that brief span all the drudgery of their day to day is forgotten and "wiped clean". Magnifying how and why centuries of women in horrific relationships remain with terrible, violent and abusive men, and continue to do so today!

I can see why this was subtitled "identity crisis", this piece continues by juxtaposing whether Hetero sex is "sin" or "intimacy". Drawing the question are Heterosexual women "predetermined" to be led to the "slaughter" through sex? Or is sex the slaughter? Hmmm...

This page extends the Het women living in a dreamy utopia trope, only to wake from this peaceful fairy tale into reality which is a living nightmare! This seems to be saying that Heterosexual women require "fiction" to live because reality is far too difficult for their feeble constitutions. Which if we extrapolate would indicate the invention of the fair tale itself to the multi-billion dollar industry of romance! Whoa!

I loved the snarky apology at the end of chapter four, kind of a sorry/not sorry and the teeter-totter of male hope coupled with male violence. Brilliant!

Stay tuned for chapter five and six!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

Andrea Dworkin-InterCourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 5 & 6)

July 27, 2019, 1:19 pm

≫ Next: Andrea Dworkin-InterCourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 7-9)

≪ Previous: Andrea Dworkin-Intercourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 3 & 4)

Chapters five and six of InterCourse do not slow down, but continue full throttle pedal to the metal!

Chapter 5 seems to be saying the very act of intercourse certifies possession, but who exactly is being possessed? The sex of the person thrusting and the person surrendering goes unnamed, seeming to say (at least to us) thrusting and surrendering is in the eye of the beholder, equal, but different! WOW! Thats a powerful statement, or is it?!

"Possession requires access to every inch", InterCourse continues propelling the reader to question everything they know about Het sex and Het relationships! Candidly brilliant, yet softly subtle! True intimacy can only be magical when its raw and the only way to truly possess another, own another is by route of fucking! What?! Did I just read that correctly?!!!!

The next page of the book has the word secrets written in large letters, undoubtedly there is something going on here we're supposed to figure out and like a good detective novel, the secret is hiding in plain sight! Het community transformed human nature by overpowering meaning! Nothing is what it seems, yet it is exactly as it is! The secret is in the pictures below the prose, no spoiler here, see if you can figure it out!

The use of normal woman is fascinating here, especially when the response seems unsure. As the response seems definitely indecisive, we can only assume the writer is stating that Het female normality is capricious. Hmmm....

The Flaubert (realism) quote situates itself perfectly in part two of InterCourse; pursuing the trope (?) or truth of the Het female condition; women wanting/gagging to fuck, but not wanting to bear any responsibility when they do. Through this analysis we can clearly see how the MeToo movement was able to twist inside out the "you cant rape the willing" trope to publicly executing (no trial, no facing one's accusers, no defense) anyone, any woman who chose to label a rapist, willing participation not important!

The opening of chapter six entitled Virginity, is on its head bonkers (IOHO)! The "daddy" to whom the female figure speaks is unclear. Is this a daughter talking to her father or a woman talking to her male lover? Or is the female figure's ambiguity the message????

The antithetical elements of this page are exemplary; working the disparity between the Chinese women to drive the message that follows, being that there are many facets (good and bad) of Het women everywhere.

The departure from the norm seems to continue; between the teeth marks left by patriarchy and an unnamed woman wearing men's clothes that give her super human indestructibility by using the guise of a man.

It is intriguing that there is a wedding announcement, but we dont know who is being joined together in wedlock. We encounter "his mistress", a "pagan priest" who decapitates the devil, clearly this is metaphor for the austere lengths that Het women go to for a man. Oh my!

The chapter ends queerly, including another reference to the devil, whereby a bored Het female seemingly sits beneath a costumed male skeletal figure, while above to the right stands a giggly girl who represents (?) the future bored unhappy Het woman. Lining the bottom of the last two chapter's pages without explanation is the words Inter Course. Is the course of Het relationships something to be buried? Something thats already dead? Or something needing a course of action to come between Het women and men?

Stay tuned for chapters 7 and 8! Hold on to your hats, this little gem is really heating up!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

Andrea Dworkin-InterCourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 7-9)

October 1, 2019, 12:22 pm

≫ Next: Straight Female Romance Sometimes Transcends Men, But NEVER Biology

≪ Previous: Andrea Dworkin-InterCourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 5 & 6)

Sorry for the long delay in finishing Miss Dworkin's Inter-course review, this post will conclude the rest of the book!

Chapter 7 of Inter-course leaves one feeling almost steamrolled! The chapter begins:

Occupation and collaboration, clearly meaning that for as much as women are occupied (with men/by men) they equally collaborate with men to be occupied. I guess sometimes the obvious must be stated! And the bit about "dry bottoms"? Brilliant! Moving on:

Intercourse as an abusive religion? What?! Is she for real reel?! You bet! And proclaiming that if women's God does not exist then women's bodies cannot exist? Powerful stuff man! You go girrl!
Miss Dworkin continues:

Freedom for women, Miss Dworkin seems to be saying, can only be found through fucking/intercourse. Thats a profoundly enlightened position to posit, but none the less there it is!
I was also floored by the last line on this page, a unique way telling women do not forget what you just read! She steps on the gas and doesnt look back as the chapter ends:

Intercourse can be sexual equality, think about that for a minute! Is Miss Dworkin saying that equality between women and men will be found in the battlefields of the sexual arena?

Hold your breath, chapter 8 up next!

More intercourse insights!

Then a left turn into sodomy, oh my!

This feels a bit homophobic to me, but or butt, that may be because I'm associating ass fucking with homo men. The poem that follows on the next page is absoFUCKINGlutely brilliant! Read on!

I didnt know whether to laugh or take it seriously, but butt between us I loled! And the final page of chapter 8, umm well...I'm speechless!

How will this book end and will ablue-footed booby be involved?! The rest of the book is in over drive speeding toward a road that dead ends off a cliff! Hold on to your hats!

Hope you enjoyed the review, Miss Dworkin's book will surely go down in the anal's of history!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

↧

Straight Female Romance Sometimes Transcends Men, But NEVER Biology

October 11, 2019, 12:01 pm

≫ Next: Cherry Blossom Life asks Dirt some pointed Questions

≪ Previous: Andrea Dworkin-InterCourse-an Interpretive Dance (Ch 7-9)

Propagating the species, or the naked truth about the Heterosexual Human animal. Het females biologically are designed to want want want babies and Het males are biologically designed to want want want to have sex/orgasm, which until very recent times was the sole requirement in baby making. Seven and a half billion people strong one would think, like wisdom teeth, Humans would have evolutionalized past sex sex sex and babies babies babies. Unfortunately for our over populated planet Earth that is not the case.

Yes dear reader I can hear you thinking loudly Dirt, where the hell is this going? It goes to explain further core diametrical difference between STRAIGHTBIANS and us-Homo females. For example lets take a gander at a few recent issues of Het women's mags/site vs Lesbian ones. Het women's first:

What runs through/underlines the pages of these women's rags and those like them be it past, present and future is Hetero female's biological procreative drives and the many many lies/disguises used to fulfill them.

Now lets check out some current Lesbian article interests:

Lesbian i.e. STRAIGHTBIAN mag/rags/articles are merely Hetero women's mags/rags/articles with a large sticky sweet slice of mental disturbance/illness or just plain crazy on the side; but regardless, SEX is the dominant feature/interest. Meaning, you can take the Hetero woman out (drive out of via abuse/weakness/fear) of Heterosexual relationships, but you cannot take Hetero biology out of Het women.

If a Lesbian or Lesbian source's primary focus involves SEX, be it

lesbian sex
lesbian sex advice/manuals
lesbian sex toys
licking lesbian puss
lesbian dating
lesbian kissing
lesbian lusts
lesbian relationships
lesbian kink
lesbian asexuality
lesbians squatted compact in hand checking out their vagina's
lesbians masturbating
lesbian group sex
lesbian in vitro
lesbian sperm donors
lesbian pregnancy
lesbians having babies
lesbians and their children
lesbians baby showers
lesbians for penetration
lesbians against penetration
lesbian HOT or NOT
lesbian burlesque
lesbian strippers
lesbian call girls
lesbians in the sex industry
lesbians against sex work
lesbians who still have sex with men
lesbian bed death
lesbian shoes
lesbian clothes
lesbian make up
lesbians against make up
lesbians sticking Barbie dolls in their vagina's
abortion issues
prostitution/sex trafficking
rape
domestic abuse

You can be certain you are dealing with, or your reading source is a damaged Hetero female-NOT a Biological Homo Female (BHF).

Nope, not a BLT (bacon/lettuce/tomato).

Not a BLH (bad lesbian haircut).

Not a VHS (video home system).

Not a UHF (ultra high frequency).

Thats right, BHF (biological homo female)!

Dirt

↧

Cherry Blossom Life asks Dirt some pointed Questions

October 28, 2019, 10:23 am

≫ Next: I am Not Radical-I am Homosexual

≪ Previous: Straight Female Romance Sometimes Transcends Men, But NEVER Biology

Dirt

↧

I am Not Radical-I am Homosexual

October 30, 2019, 9:26 am

≫ Next: Did Radical Feminism Open the Door to Transitioning Children?

≪ Previous: Cherry Blossom Life asks Dirt some pointed Questions

In a recent video chat I did with CherryBlossomLife, one of her questions for me sprang from another Radical Feminist. The question basically was, how did I become “radical/radicalized“. I wanted to address the question a little more thoroughly in a post.

The very notion that Radical Feminists and other women see/view me as some sort of radical, goes to the swell of ongoing data that Mrs Dirt and I are slowly compiling concerning the mass biological differences between Heterosexual women and Homosexual females.

The question alone, accompanied by nothing else, is all the data required to know the person asking the question is a Heterosexual female AND know the questioner herself does not know Homosexual females. How you may ask can one ascertain that kind of info from just a simple question?

Lets look first at the term radical and its basic meaning:

Far beyond the norm. Whose norm? General society’s. Particularly general Heterosexual society! The society that Radical Feminists claim to “eschew” for varying reasons.

But what happens when you are born far beyond the norm? Can one be born a radical? Probably not. And I did not personally have a hand in choosing which of my father’s sperm cells were to meet a particular egg in waiting of my mother’s. Pure chance. Or timing, which is also chance.

But thats how Homosexuality works. Some might say its bad luck. Some might say it is great luck. And others might say it is a mistake. But no one says it is radical. Until or unless biology is removed from the equation.

Was it radical that I was a captain and/or first or second picked among all boys for sport games or games that required athletic abilities?

Was it radical that males were always/are my nearest peer group?

Was it radical that as a female I was treated by children/adults according to my behaviour rather than my sex?

Was it radical when on the girls track and field team in high school I refused to wear the (straight) girl’s uniform? And when confronted by the entire team and both coaches to wear the uniform, I walked away.

Was it radical that even in my 20’s I was still called to play (tackle) football with adult males? And was physically up to the challenge with every take down.

Is it radical that I communicate directly? Requiring few words to convey lofty messages.

Is it radical to be repeatedly believed to be or mistaken to be a man online for how I communicate?

Is it radical that when slandered by thousands I remain unflustered, do not have a melt down nor go into hysterics?

Is it radical to carve out the truth despite the constant rain of Radical Feminist storms trying to silence my every word?

Is it radical to simply say NO? To have self determination in the presence of men. To think for oneself. Act for oneself. To not lay blame on an imagined culprit like “patriarchy” for example, for one’s personal fears or failures. Basically, to own your own shit!

My norms, from my earliest memories until now have always seemed radical by Heterosexuals, particularly Het women. Because they judge my NORMAL behaviour based on their NORMAL behaviour, NOT on our different biology. My experiences as being perceived as some sort of radical or dissident by straight society is not unusual nor very different than it is for any biological homosexual female.

And it is through knowing ourselves, our innate biological differences from that of Heterosexuals that I and my wife CAN tell biology through a computer screen. Together we have spent a little over a century between us utterly surrounded by Heterosexuals and all things Heterosexual.

Believe me when I tell you, we know you better than you dare to know yourselves!

So while these innate biological differences may make my normal Homo behaviour seem radical, I’m merely a normal biological Homosexual female being and behaving according to my biology. I am not special. I am simply NOT Heterosexual.

Dirt

↧

Did Radical Feminism Open the Door to Transitioning Children?

November 16, 2019, 12:28 pm

≫ Next: Women's Liberation Front-WoLF Goes Rabid

≪ Previous: I am Not Radical-I am Homosexual

I have mentioned umpteen times on social media and written categorically here on the miscalculation/hapless strategy Radical Feminists place/d on Gender. Specifically on Radical Feminist's theorizing and then believing their theory that Gender (the not very well thought out idea, having no basis in reality (past or present), that collective man ie patriarchy, is responsible for the woes (however small or large) any and all Het women have regardless of how they ID) is the key to unlocking Het women's misery/weaknesses.

I have established how

RadFems/Feminists past (RadFem/Feminists today ignore these facts) jumped on the John Money-brains-have-no-sex bandwagon because they passively were handed an explanation-gender-(FROM MEN) on why men run the world and not them-SOCIALIZATION not Biology! They didnt care this info came from known MALE pedophiles whose "studies" consisted of boy twins being forced to act out Heterosexual male/female sex scenarios and pedophiles masturbating infants to see how long it took them to get an erection! Studies that as quick as they were published were soon found to have been fudged by said pedophiles.

Radical Feminist desperation for internal/external power superseded any care for the children harmed (many mortally harmed) by the MEN proposing the brain is born out of experience (constructed) rather than sex (biology) idea. Radical Feminist history that made children expendable and propped up the MEN whose theories supported theirs has changed very little in the last forty years. In this post I'll show how Radical Feminism/Feminism past eerily coincides with Radical Feminists/Feminists now, to the cold, bitter and bloody detriment of children today.

Early Radical Feminists/Feminists single minded focus on Gender as a social construct built by Collective man/Patriarchy to keep Het women down blinded them to the man/men (John Money et al) they climbed into bed with. Gender Identity, the Frankensteinian failed experiment tested on children, ignored by Radical Feminists whose eyes never strayed from the perceived greater prize, simultaneously green lighted the proliferation of Het male trans. Before Radical Feminists had time to wipe their own collective ass, Het male trans were entering spaces once occupied ONLY by females. By the time the 1980's commenced, it finally dawned on a few Radical Feminists (Houston we might have a problem)!

The first and primary initiate used by Radical Feminists/Feminists to gate keep male trans was the woman-born-woman idea. Meaning unless you are BORN (biology) female, you cannot become a woman. Male trans being born male cannot, regardless of cross sexed hormone treatment/plastic surgeries become women and therefore should not be allowed into women only spaces. Bear in mind, all this occurring while Radical Feminists/Feminists were using Feminism to enter spaces held previously only by men. Hmmmm!

The women/womyn-born-women/womyn policy worked to a point; because Feminists/especially male proponents of Feminism created legal equalities for the SEXES in the public sphere, Radical Feminists/Feminists could not discriminate against male trans without fear of legal reprisals. However privately owned properties like Michfest for instance, the women/womyn-born-women/womyn policy could stand so long as public/corporate sponsorships werent involved. Unfortunately men being men, male trans continued unabated to gain entrance to Michfest and the like and men being men, challenged/changed existing laws with which to do so successfully.

While male trans were busy fighting for the legal right to be women, Radical Feminists/Feminists had to step back, take stock and figure out a new tactic to keep men at bay. I suspect their brainstorming went a little like this:

While there has been no shortages of "transwomen arent women" incantations throughout social media in the last decade, this alone has done nothing to slow male trans down, in fact it has had the opposite effect. By women calling these males some form/any form of woman (transwoman/transwomen), especially treating male trans the way Het women routinely treat each other, such as the extreme criticism of how women look. For example, this from Radical Feminist/Feminist/Gender Crits women criticizing a male trans celebrity:

and

The point being by addressing male trans as some form of woman, by treating them the way women generally treat each other, via a bitchy bitchfestiness, many male trans feel like they are finally just one of the girls! So Radical Feminists/Feminists began using the idea of female lived experience. What would a 60 year old man who has transitioned really KNOW about what it is to be a woman? To be treated by your parents/relatives/school/church/society as a girl/woman. Male trans may take hormones and have surgeries to help them better appear woman-like, they do not have however the lived experience that women have growing up as girls/women. Here Radical Feminists/Feminists believed they had made the ultimate chess move! But instead of checkmate, they should have checked themselves before the wrecked themselves AND innocent children! But while busily patting themselves on the back in a win for sisterhood, men continued to do what men do.

For the Heterosexual females reading this post, let me give you a little tip about men; when they strongly believe in a cause, they will work their butts off doing whatever is needed EVEN if they themselves will not benefit from the potential success. If criteria for woman is based on physical appearance AND lived experience then by golly so be it! Enter changes to the DSM 5, enter trans children. Trans lobbies couched trans children like any dis/ease, early detection means a greater chance for survival. It also means Radical Feminists/Feminists cannot say someone like Jazz Jennings does not have the lived experience of being RAISED a girl.

In effort to close the door they fought so hard to open, Radical Feminists/Feminists hooked up with the Gender Criticals, a small number of bored mostly conservative Homophobic mothers/housewives criticizing how other women were/are raising their children. Gender Crits claim the health of children being transitioned is the heart of their cause. Obviously a bullshit claim because Gender Crits are okay with adult transition. Clearly the numerous negative health effects from transition, do not magically stop the moment someone turns 18!

The Radical Feminist/Feminist/Gender Crit ménage has been too busy arguing amongst themselves, fucking each other, fucking each other over, climbing in and out of bed with religious-conservative MEN, attacking adult male trans at their homes/workplaces/social media and least we forget making stickers, t-shirts and posters with their hubby's hard earned coin. And how many children has this sundry circle jerk successfully stopped from the trans grist? Exactly at this time? Lets count them: nil, nada, none, nothing, zero, zilch, diddly-squat, sod-all, a goose egg, not a sausage and lets not NOT forget to count Sweet FA!

Social Media Feminism is like Tinder dating; the picture might look good, the profile read like a dream, but when you meet for the first date neither party can recognize the other from their profile fibs and neither bothered to fact check beyond the profile. Radical Feminists/Feminists saw Gender Crits opposition to trans childrenand said lets date! And Gender Crits saw Radical Feminists/Feminists history of anti transand said YES!

But lets face it, the reality is Radical Feminism consisting of damaged Het women with a misdirected hatred toward collective man while Gender Criticalists are comprised of mostly bored mothers whose children are past needing diapering and whose hubby's are busy with anything/anyone except them. One group cannot see past their pathological hatred and the other cannot bear to see period; some people should not be dating!

Radical (STRAIGHTBIAN/Lesbian allies) Feminists/Feminists couldnt be bothered to notice Gender Crits extreme Homphobia, nor did Gender Crits bother to look beyond Radical Feminists/Feminists anti trans history to see it was Radical Feminism itself via dismantling Gender that ushered in the Transgender Movement, including the later move to transition children. And now its morning and both are crying coyote ugly. But gnawing off your own arm to get the fuck away from each other isnt going to bring back a healthy childhood to children lost to transition anymore than its going to prevent another child OR adult from the mental and physical harm of transition.

But regardless of the ongoing feminist catfights that always were and will be, Radical Feminism's Gender theories have proven to be a desecration to both women AND children.

Dirt

↧

Women's Liberation Front-WoLF Goes Rabid

January 16, 2020, 2:24 pm

≫ Next: Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 1

≪ Previous: Did Radical Feminism Open the Door to Transitioning Children?

Let me begin this post by stating full stop, this blog's focus has always in one way or another been focused on Homosexual females, this post is no different. And while this post might not appear to be centered on Homo females, as Tilly from Miranda says "Bear with"!

As my wife and I have been busy with the recent holidays and another project (that yes is Homo female focused) it might seem like we are not aware of what has BEEN going on in areas online/offline that affect us, we are btw. We have both chosen to keep out of internet nonsense unless we feel it is worth our precious time. For me, this is such a time.

I have had multiple readers, including some Radical Feminists asking me to write something on the Homophobic Hate group WoLF. I have until now refrained because frankly, they were not really worth my time. After given a recent heads up on their latest Hate Speech filled "evening" scheduled in NY this Friday, specifically the Homophobes speaking at this engagement and another deplorable incident brought to my attention, I emphatically said YES, I will write something on WoLF and their Homophobic members/agenda.

The event in question is this:

I will largely focus on those speaking at this event and a few other WoLF hangers-on.

In the order from their website the speakers are as follows along with my comments on them:

Dominique Christinais a writer, performer, educator, and activist.

Dominique Christina's claim to fame is slam poetry, of which she does well. She does not appear to have done any sort of work on gay, lesbian or transgender issues. I can see only one reason WoLF was interested in having her join their little band of enmity for this occasion.

Libby Emmons is a writer and mother in Brooklyn, NY.

Het privileged Homophobe Libby Emmons is so violently Homophobic one feels just skimming her writings like they have been queer bashed! A few quotes from Libs as an example:

I dont know if Libby is too busy being a mom/writer to do her research, but it is patently clear she knows little about how transgenderism was green lighted by Radical Feminism. Something WoLF states on their own website is their aim to"ultimately dismantle the gender-caste system". Umm Libby? WoLF? Congratulate yourselves, you are succeeding! Men are legally women all over the world thanks you and women like you! Also by Libs is this offensives garbage:

While Libs is being somewhat facetious, I have to ask WHY DID LIBBY CHOOSE TO FACETIOUSLY ADD THE "R" TO THE LGBTQIA and not to Heterosexuals? Could this possibly be why:

This is from the DSM I (1952). Clearly Libby Emmons believes fucking a robot is the equivalent to being a Homosexual ie pervert! Again Libby fails in her research department because there is a vast difference to being Homosexual (begins at conception ends at death) and a Heterosexual male banging a replica of a human. Thats right Libs, HETEROSEXUAL MALES ARE THE ONES FUCKING ROBOTS NOT US! Keep YOUR perverts in YOUR lane! Thank you very much!

Linda Bellos was born in London in 1950.

Linda Bellos, like many who associate with WoLF is a hands-across-the-errr-cocksucker of the Homophobic Heritage Foundation who are known for such bullshit as this:

Heritage Foundation is a Hate group using scare tactics to frighten the general public and honey poured on their cocks to entice the gender crit ignorants such as WoLF. But I digress, a few quotes from an interview with Linda:

In other words, Linda Bellos CHOSE to partner with women, she is NOT a biological Homosexual and as such, she does NOT have OUR particular interests and needs in any capacity in mind! Explains how she can hop on the Heritage Hog so easily! Like a few others in the UK, Linda got herself into a pickle when she verbally threatened to bash some male trans online:

Funny Linda screams the old transwomen arent women slogan, yet she refers here to male trans as "bitches"...Hmmm. While it is its own nonsense, nevertheless this kind of behaviour is as unproductive as it is ridiculous.

Meghan Murphy is an internationally acclaimed journalist in Vancouver.

Meghan Murphy is probably most known for the largest cry baby tantrum ever seen on social media when banned from Twitter for flagrantly not following Twitter's TOS.

Big tech giants, like anyone, anywhere are counting on you as a user to follow the rules/guidelines you agreed to when you signed up. It does not deserve my time or my donation! Along with her inability to follow basic social media guidelines, she will however use her own platform to slam Homosexuals:

These types of HOMOPHOBES are the fucking worst! Its a big fat backhanded (oh I'm sure homos marrying is ok, getting hitched might even be fun-BUT), yeah, fuck you too Meghan Murphy! Never in my life did I even think I would get married. Not because I didnt want to, but because I never believed for a moment it would ever be humanly possible! Fortunately that possibility came shortly after the right person came into my life and until that moment that we both said our "I do's" did I realise just how much Homosexuals have been denied, because trust me when I say, being married DOES make a difference and with the right person it is a beautiful thing! Marriage is not about fun or sexism, it is about love with legal protections from bigots like the Meghan Murphy's of the world!

Natasha Chart is the board chair of the Women’s Liberation Front.

Natasha Chart has this to say about herself:

Basically Natasha finds men and women both attractive but men make more money so sorry ladies Nat is strictly about about who can best finance her. Given that we shouldnt be surprised by this:

Yes, you read that correctly. Natasha Chart is another patron of the Homophobic Heritage Hog! And since she is a board chair for WoLF we can see why WoLF is drowning in a sick seabed of Homophobia!

Posie Parker is the founder of Standing For Women.

Posie Parker has long been known to be a virulent racist and Homophobe, my wife and I can both personally attest to her Homophobia. PP (wife and mother-careful PP Meghan doesnt approve!) uses the idea of motherhood to extend her motherly (lol) instincts to children being transitioned. And like most Gender Crits once someone has reached adulthood:

Apparently PP does not think motherhood should extend to trans females regardless of point in transition. This from a woman who spends more time telling other women how to be mothers than being a mother herself. Now to address a speck of the rampant Homophobia that PP routinely spews:

The type of Homophobic articles Posie Parker enjoyed sharing on her Facebook before her account was rightfully suspended.

I pray her children are not Homosexuals. Apparently PP is too ignorant to know us adult Homosexuals were once child Homosexuals!

Homosexuality according to Posie Parker and I quote is "SHIT"! As Posie was cautioned over her nutfuckery in the UK, she came over the the good old USofA to peddle her hate by harassing a male trans at work of all places:

I suspect thats the reason Bellos and Parker are headlining this little shindig, too fucking cowardly to speak openly in England!

The problem with self interest groups like WoLF is that their Homophobia is not contained to their little group, it spreads online like contagion. And like contagion it is usually the weak who are most at risk, in this case mentally ill women believing a RadFem group is their personal lord-ess and savior. The depths of their depravity truly knows no bounds, but more on that later. First I digress...

Before I continue, let me say, until right here, right now, you will not find a single mention of Cathy Brennan anywhere on this blog.

It is no shock or surprise that I am not a fan nor friend of Cathy Brennan's. It is probably no shock or surprise that some years ago over something I wrote here Cathy Brennan sent me a cease and desist letter. What is a shock and surprise is that I am here to call out a few of the mentally disturbed WoLFers for their infuckingsane harassment of Brennan simply because she has called out the HOMOPHOBIA of WoLF/WoLF members and other gender crits. This from one such mentally disturbed RadFem:

Rather than bother to investigate Kip aka Carol's claim because Brennan is on a shit list, Carol's gaslighting easily takes flame:

This was some of the initial harassment, it later gets much worse:

And this contagion spread:

Hating Cathy Brennan is what is bringing together RadFems and Male Trans? And the stupidity award meme goes to Jen Ziggen-congrats hun you earned it!

These deplorable women would rather harass someone fighting for THEIR rights rightfully, all because Brennan chose not to hop on the we-hate-homos Heritage Hog. And harass her literally right after her father died, which in and of itself is horrible and difficult, but when a death is on or near our most precious holidays, holidays that hold some of our most treasured memories, it is an extra burden, one to be felt acutely whenever that holiday arrives for the rest of their life.

And while there are always the odd rogue hangers-on/leaches, it is up to the group to rein those folks in or release them altogether. But there was none of that, not even after the flat out psycho's making fun of Brennan's father dying or wishing Brennan had died instead of M. Berns! My wife being the Aspergerie gal that she is decided she was going to note how many friends these two particular nut fucks lost, a whopping ZERO. See this is what I was talking about with contagion, it isnt just limited to the group but to everything and everyone they touch!

WoLF and any of its associates or Gender Crit kooks are not invested in saving "trans kids", they, like the Heritage Foundation are invested in slowing down Gay and Lesbian progress, halting Gay and Lesbian progress and reversing Gay and Lesbian progress UNDER the guise of anti-transgenderism! Transgenders are not transitioning themselves! Think about it!

But supporting right-wing hate groups, especially the BRITS who will not remotely be affected by how United States HATE legislation via HATE groups like WoLF/Heritage Foundation will affect Homosexuals, INCLUDING women who chose to partner with other women! Hello! I feel like I am watching a vicious rabid dog eat its own self and biting the hand of anyone trying to save it.

Women's Lib Front may pretend to be a WoLF in sheep's clothing, but I'm not your grandma nor red riding hood!

dirt

PS I dedicate this to Brits Posie and Linda

↧

Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 1

March 25, 2020, 2:05 pm

≫ Next: Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 2

≪ Previous: Women's Liberation Front-WoLF Goes Rabid

Due to the vast and often contradictory/convoluted information we have had to wade neck-deep through, this series of posts, as of right now, has no definitive end.

To regular readers of this blog: While these posts may seem to be a bit off the beaten path, it will quickly become apparent that this topic is actually very much in line with everything this blog has long stood for.

That being said, let me briefly explain how Mrs Dirt and I have become embroiled in the missing persons case of Kristin Snyder.

Mrs Dirt noticed a series of various attention-grabbing headlines regarding a purported "sex cult". As the headlines continued, and more information became available, we were both perplexed at how the #MeToo/post #MeToo movement has completely robbed women of all responsibility/agency, and nowhere was that more apparent than the NXIVM debacle.

Fast forward and many conversations between us later, a documentary called The Lost Women of NXIVM aired on the Discovery ID channel in December 2019. It follows "~~investigative journalist~~" conspiracy theorist Frank Parlato as he insinuates that Keith Raniere, the fallen leader of NXIVM, had a role in the deaths of 4 women.

The obvious problem with this documentary is simple: Parlato's paranoid pontifications and his questionable "witnesses" fail to meet even the barest bones of "proof", and his boneheaded theories are more full of holes than Swiss cheese that has been blasted with a shotgun. Since one of these so-called "lost women"~~examined~~slandered was Kristin Snyder, a ~~lesbian~~ Homosexual female, our interest was immediately piqued. That, and the fact that Mrs Dirt, who at that time was heavily involved with missing persons cases, had no recollection of Kristin Snyder's case (she naturally took note of cases involving Homosexual persons). Obvious also by the program's end was that the ID producers of this docu-salacious/sensationalism-mentary hurried this project to the point of junior high editing and grade school interviewing, accompanied by a complete disregard to contradictions so copious that they occurred more often than they did NOT occur!

So, let's take an initial look at the case of one of the 4 "lost women": Kristin Snyder.

What is known: Kristin Snyder, by all accounts, was reported to be a happy, successful, ambitious 35-year-old who ran her own environmental consulting business, volunteered for the Nordic Ski Patrol, and enjoyed many outdoors sports/activities. She had attained a master's degree in ecology, and had published academic papers in her specialized field. She was living in Anchorage, Alaska at the time of her disappearance with her partner, Heidi Clifford, with whom she was joined in a civil partnership in Vermont in September of 2001.

According to the Alaska State Troopers police report, dated February 7, 2003, Anchorage Police Department reported to the Alaska State Troopers that there was a missing persons report on Kristin Snyder, and that she had been reported to be possibly "suicidal" and that there was "information that she might be in Seward "(Alaska).

Kristin's car, a 1999 black Toyota Tacoma truck, was found on February 8, 2003 in Lowell Point near Miller's Landing at Resurrection Bay in Seward, Alaska. An extensive official search was conducted around the Seward area, but no sign of Kristin Snyder has ever been found. According to a later report, a bizarre 2-part note was found in her truck. A key was found in the door of her vehicle.

Kristin Snyder was presumed by everyone at that time to have committed suicide, and a presumptive death certificate was applied for in January 2004 and granted in July 2004, although she is still officially classified as missing.

That's it. That is all that is truly known. So little and so convoluted, in fact, after viewing Lost Women, both of us initially suspected Kristin Snyder was not real! We took to Ancestry to find out she very much was real!

The rest of the purported ~~evidence~~hearsay presented by Parlato (and many others) since her disappearance is dubious at best -- an odd combination of revenge-motivated slander, contradictions, confusion, misdirection, conflicting reports, rank speculation, conspiracy theories, wishful thinking, willful ignorance, and even outright lies.

Depending on who is telling the story and what the agenda-du-jour is, the various stories range from laughable to ludicrous and back again.

Somewhere between Anchorage and Albany, between Heidi and Frank, between Catholicism and sex cults, between facts and fiction, between reality and fantasy, who Kristin Snyder reallyis/was has been completely lost -- obliterated by self-preservation, ennui, vivid imaginations, twisted agendas, and mind-blowing exploitation.

Every crime analysis begins with victimology. Victimology gives a baseline (like a lie detector) on the victim that can thereafter be used to measure truths and lies about the victim. The same process should have been carried out in Kristin's case and needs to be done now. Who was she? What were her habits? What did she like? What did she hate? What motivated her? What frightened her? What made her laugh? What were her hopes, her plans, her dreams, her morals, her ethics?

We don't know. Very little is known about the actual Kristin Snyder -- the real human being behind the crude cartoon caricatures alleged in the docu-nonsense, by Kristin's bent-kneed, mouth-drooling, wafer-warring kin, and by anyone/s with a grudge against Keith Raniere/NXIVM, perhaps even including the woman she said "I do" to.

While we may not know who Kristin Snyder was, we do KNOW who she wasNOT. Based on documented reports, including personal exchanges we have had with some who knew her personally and professionally, Kristin was a stable, happy, successful person. Through our growing body of research and ongoing inquiries, it is clear that Kristin was NOT the STRAIGHTBIAN, weak, psychotic, cheating, lying, gullible, foolish, pregnant, purple-slippered sycophant that she is currently being portrayed as.

But before we get into the actual missing persons case of Kristin Snyder, the next series of posts will fully and completely dismantle ID channel's mockumentary The Lost Women of NXIVM. We will systematically address each individual speaking about Kristin, each contradiction, each implausibility, each individual's agenda, and each individual's honesty, integrity, and reliability. When we are through with this series of posts, we will have also laid to rest YEARS of agenda-based lies on Kristin Snyder that reach far outside Lost Women.

In the meantime, if anyone has any information or would like to join myself, Mrs Dirt and our small but growing network invested in seeking truth and justice for Kristin Snyder, please email us at Justice4Kristin@mail.com

Until next time...

↧

Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 2

April 13, 2020, 12:32 pm

≫ Next: Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 3

≪ Previous: Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 1

The next part in our forensic postmortem of the mockumentary The Lost Women of NXIVM will consist of dissecting the major proponents surrounding the Kristin Snyder piece beginning with the obvious, Frank Parlato Jr-"a former NXIVM publicist turned ~~investigative journalist~~ who will lead "viewers through a two-hour ~~investigation~~ that questions if there is more to this sadistic story."

There is no mention in the documentary of Parlato's criminal prosecution."

Due to a long history of corruption (accused, proven and pending) on Frank Parlato Jr, we are only including a scant bit solely for the purpose of illustrating exactly what kind of character Parlato is, everything else will be tied to Parlato's wild inane theories of Kristin Snyder/her disappearance and those in the mockumentary who chose to co-sign with Parlato in Lost Women.

Frank Parlato Jr the business man:

The marriage between developer Frank Parlato Jr. and several prominent inner-city housing activists is off.
The activists are divorcing themselves from Parlato and his Neighbors Inc. over what they say is his method of operation. They contend Parlato is disorganized, doesn't consult with others in the group before acting, is preoccupied with garnering publicity and has made some questionable business decisions...Meldrum said that too often, Parlato did what it took to generate favorable publicity without tending to the details or consulting with others in the group. Meldrum said he became increasingly concerned about the direction Parlato was taking Neighbors. Parlato's willingness to work with notorious landlords to repair and sell properties was especially troubling, Meldrum said.

These very same questionable tactics are what brought Parlato to work for Keith Raniere AND later be fired by Raniere.

In 1997 Greg Olma joined forces with Buffalo City Councilman David Franczyk to investigate Frank Parlato, Jr. and the various corporations set up by Mr. Parlato.

Federal officials are cracking down on one of Buffalo's biggest housing developers by taking away their lifeblood -- government-insured mortgages.
The government, in a letter dated Friday, announced an immediate, one-year ban against the Parlato family as part of its ongoing campaign against waste, fraud and abuse.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development also left the door open to more serious sanctions against the Parlatos. They include monetary penalties and a lifetime ban on using federally-insured loans to help low-income home buyers.
Two local lawmakers have accused the Parlatos of running a housing scam that hurts poor people, takes advantage of the government and adds to neighborhood blight...Twice over the past five years, a Parlato family member was voluntarily suspended from government business, according to federal records. The Parlatos agreed to the voluntary suspensions after HUD recommended even stronger penalties. In both cases, HUD pushed for a three-year "debarment" of the Parlatos.

The land near the American Falls and Seneca Niagara Casino should be among the region's most valuable, but it sure doesn't look that way to people catching their first glimpse...There's a run-down shopping mall with only two active businesses. Water drips from its skylights. A shabby covered walkway attached to the mall features graffiti, broken windows and escalators that don't work...city leaders are bent on improving the city's business climate, particularly downtown, but to succeed, they'll be forced to deal with several property owners who have had little success completing projects in the Falls...*Frank R. Parlato Jr., a former Buffalo housing developer who manages a nine-story building outside Niagara Falls State Park and at one point was heating the place with cooking oil.

Frank Parlato, publisher of the Niagara Falls Reporter, went on a full frontal attack against the Seneca Niagara in what could only be characterized as a racist rant. Never mind that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 specifically addressed the need and ability of Native nations to build casinos for economic development to help tribes dig out from the crush of decades of abject poverty.

One Niagara is possibly the most valuable piece of real estate in the City of Niagara Falls. It was once owned by Niagara Falls Reporter’s publisher and low-income housing scam artist Frank Parlato.Parlato utilized this property as a parking lot and a trashy bazaar. No wonder he fell behind on his property taxes, at times owing the City, County and School District around One Million Dollars. Under Parlato’s ownership, the building was condemned multiple times too. It is even rumored that Parlato was living in the building.

Today LaurelCanyoner described Parlato as "shaaady" and "a scary regressive idiot who can't put a sentence together." Back in 2012, Alan Bedenko (aka Buffalopundit) a lawyer who blogs about western NY, called Parlato a "lunatic" and "a sick and twistedly virulent homophobe." Last month Phil Fairbanks in a Buffalo News article asked if Frank Parlato was a crusading reporter or a fraudster. Over the years, he has been called a low income housing scam artist, and a racist, a misogynist, and a liar, while the US Govt. believes he's a criminal.
Whether Frank Parlato is a criminal will be decided in a few months when Parlato will be tried on 18 counts of wire fraud and wire fraud conspiracy, money laundering, and corrupt interference with the administration of the IRS. Of course Parlato claims he is innocent and this is a "fake indictment," but it's not as if this is the only time Parlato or his family have run afoul of the law or his practices have been called into question.

Like the old indictment, the new one still charges Parlato with wire fraud and alleges that he orchestrated a scheme that involved shell companies and bank accounts. Prosecutors also say Parlato cheated the Internal Revenue Service and are demanding he forfeit $4 million. The charges against Parlato are the result of a five-year FBI investigation into his business dealings in Niagara Falls and his ownership of One Niagara, the downtown office and retail center that many still remember as the Occidental Chemical building.

For reasons unknown, when Frank Parlato was working for Keith Raniere/NXIVM, Frank was using the alias Phil Robertson, this is corroborated in a 2009 deposition of Nancy Salzman-NXIVM President. While working for Keith Raniere, when Frank/Phil was asked about former charges laid by the attorney general, Frank/Phil stated:

he suspected the whole investigation was a conspiracy engineered by Wal-Mart, which felt threatened by Consumer Buyline’s low discount prices. “It’s just a brilliant idea to save people money, and I think the pinch was felt in Arkansas, and Wal-Mart felt the pinch, and they said, ‘Let’s collapse this guy.’ ”

Frank Parlato clearly has a penchant for lying regardless of what side he is on.

If you follow the links provided in our quotes, the original articles cited go to paint a broad picture of Frank Parlato the ~~businessman~~ shyster. We also feel it is equally important to paint a picture of Frank Parlato the man. This is particularly important because the Kristin Snyder of the Lost Women of NXIVM was created by and through the warped, distorted, misogynistic and homophobic lens of Frank Parlato the man. And being a man, or rather a particular type of man is VERY important to Frank Parlato, as can still be seen from a blog of his:

What is a man ?
Shopenhauer on women: while it somewhat appears to restrict the fundamental freedom of women, and in some instances is demeaning, this essay is a solid corrective for the cowardly man who tends to "pedestalize" women.
While it is true that women should be honored, and loved- they should not be obeyed or worshiped as "sex-goddesses."
This essay will help cure the peverse mind and help a man understand that it is his duty not to be weak.

Any white person, younger than 30, has lived, since the day he was born, in an America where it is legal to discriminate against white people...Men sometimes have to fight. But they are encouraged to be passive: Not only by government discrimination, but by the media’s sick culture. How contemptuously men are portrayed on TV and movies. Turn on a TV for 30 minutes and see how men are portrayed as ignorant, stupid and lazy...Women are portrayed as superior in relationships. Male characters are portrayed as henpecked. (Yet the Christian Bible — which many wish their children to follow — clearly exhorts men to lead their wives, not vice versa.)
It’s funny how those who are hypersensitive about sexism (against women) are sexist (against men) at the same time. If females were regularly portrayed as jack-asses, however, imagine the uproar. But then white men are a safe target...In Hollywood, girls are made all-powerful, (white) boys are sex-crazed idiots...Men also get bashed for unfair treatment of minorities and women. Still, I’m not sure they deserve chastisement. Slavery, for example, existed prior to biblical times, and was rampant around the world until recently. In some places, it still exists with new names: In Communist China, hundreds of millions are de-facto slaves, with less freedom than the American slave had. But consider: White men did not invent slavery.

This particular blog of Frank Parlato's is chock-full of such ignorant backward backwoods obscenities, unfortunately it doesnt end there.

From an article by Rebecca Pahle regarding a film review in 2012 that clearly had upset Frank Parlato's manly non-sensibilities, Rebecca writes "The e-mail in which the editor in question, Frank Parlato, Jr. of the Niagara Falls Reporter, expresses his hatred of all things vaguely feminist-seeming is truly a thing to behold. I find myself almost (but not quite) unable to muster any anger over the blatant sexism on display here". She goes on to quote Frank Parlato's reasoning for his disdain of the film Snow White and the Huntsman, Frank writes:

when my boys were young i would never have allowed them to go to such a film for i believe it would injure their developing manhood. if i would not let my own sons see it, why would i want to publish anything about it?
snow white and the huntsman is trash. moral garbage. a lot of fuzzy feminist thinking and pandering to creepy hollywood mores produced by metrosexual imbeciles.
I don’t want to publish reviews of films where women are alpha and men are beta.
where women are heroes and villains and men are just lesser versions or shadows of females.
i believe in manliness.
they seem to like critiques from an artistic standpoint without a word about the moral turpitude seeping into the consciousness of young people who go to watch such things as snow white and get indoctrinated to the hollywood agenda of glorifying degenerate power women and promoting as natural the weakling, hyena -like men, cum eunuchs.
the male as lesser in courage strength and power than the female. it may be ok for some but it is not my kind of manliness.

More importantly beyond Frank Parlato's blatant racism, Frank Parlato's blatant sexism and misogyny is Frank Parlato's deep deep Homophobia:

First, the Reporter is not opposed to Mr. Palumbo saying that he has an objection to homosexuality or preaching his objection even in language that may be insulting. However, I draw the line at publishing any call to make homosexuality illegal or to punish any consenting adults for practicing homosexuality...The Reporter’s defense of gay rights or gay criticism stops at limiting free speech. Let babies howl and do what they will. I have no objection to anyone trying to persuade any adult that homosexuality is wrong or right.I draw the line, however, at youth and believe it is the duty of parents to instruct their children about sexual orientation and not the government, school, media or professional sports. I think this country needs to show more respect for the rights of parents...Coming to the world of adults, I support the rights of two or more people to have any relationship they please. I do not care at all what sex organs adults have when they come into physical contact with each other for fun, for mysticism, health, or profit. I am not offended by adults who practice homosexuality, polygamy, polyandry, polyamory, promiscuity...

This reads like something from 1952, i.e. the DSM:

For Frank Parlato, Homosexuality is a sexual sport that requires two or more parties engaging in sex. He cannot fathom Homosexual children or Homosexual babies, in his narrow warped mind we are all born Heterosexual and only BECOME Homosexual through, according to Frank, and I quote "practice". Anything that has to do with Homosexuality for Frank Parlato MUST involve SEX! Why Parlato is so obsessed with sex, with whom is doing what with whom, we cannot say. But it is precisely through the lens of Parlato's sex obsessions, coupled with his extreme Homophobia that HIS personal narrative of Kristin Snyder is tainted at best and blatant (provable) lies at the worst!

And for us, our purpose is not only to avail Kristin Snyder (the missing person), BUT to restore Kristin Snyder the HOMOSEXUAL female! Restored from the FICTIONAL, easily led, easily manipulated, weak, wishy washy, psychotic, suicidal, desperate, cheater who got knocked up by the Vanguard and couldnt face an abortion Kristin Snyder who exists ONLY to serve in this case (the Lost Women of NXIVM) as Frank Parlato's personal agenda to slander a former boss who fired him!

In the meantime, if anyone has any information or would like to join myself, Mrs Dirt and our small but growing network invested in seeking truth and justice for Kristin Snyder, please email us at Justice4Kristin@mail.com

Until next time...

↧

Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 3

July 18, 2020, 12:21 pm

≫ Next: Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 4

≪ Previous: Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 2

Pardon our long absence, like everything and everyone else Covid-19 has affected our day to day, we will try to complete at least one post a week till this series is finished.

That being said, we remind you that our last post on the Kristin Snyder case/Lost Women mockumentary went to illustrate the VERY questionable, defamatory, and vengeful motives of the person behind/in front of Lost Women-Frank Parlato jr. We will now focus on some of those who chose to co-sign on the Lost Women mockumentary, beginning with Ex NXIVM coach/member Susan Faye Dones.

Some back story on Susan Dones and her NXIVM involvement according to court records:

Doneswas formerly a high-ranking member of NXIVM. She has a master's degree in psychology and held at various times the titles of "Coach,""Procter,""Trainer" and "Center Head."Dones ran NXIVM's Tacoma Center for more than five years and supervised other NXIVM coaches and trainers. She built up the center with her own time and money. She and her staff taught NXIVM's course materials to hundreds of students. As a Center Head, Dones had special access to NXIVM materials, video DVDs, student and facilitator "notes" and a list of NXIVM students. Kim Woolhouse was a Procter and Trainer and assisted Dones in opening and operating the Tacoma Center. Dones and Woolhouse took educational courses from NXIVM, in addition to their leadership responsibilities.

It is unclear whether or not Dones bought into Keith Raniere's nonsense, but she fully believed she could made a lot of money through Raniere's MLM schemes. Unfortunately Dones and her partner Woolhouse were unable to make a success (I was in over my head, and so I made a decision to file bankruptcy) of their NXIVM center in Washington, and in 2009 they...

both testified that NXIVM was very important to them, that they had spent a substantial amount of time and money to build up the Tacoma Center, and that they were fully dedicated to helping NXIVM spread its message and materials to more people. However, things began to sour in the spring of 2009. Dones and Woolhouse became aware of rumors regarding Raniere's behavior and grew increasingly disenchanted with the direction of the company as well as with NXIVM's management team, corporate strategy and its leaders' behavior. (and their lack of profit)

In April 2009, Dones and Woolhouse traveled to Albany, New York for a meeting with Raniere and seven other high-ranking NXIVM personnel...Dones attended only the first two days of the meeting; Woolhouse attended all three days. Dones videotaped the meeting with her personal video camera and retains a copy of the video of the meeting in her possession (the "2009 Video"). She later made a short excerpt of the 2009 Video that she circulated to others, as discussed infra.

While Dones and Woolhouse argue the 2009 Video is not subject to their written confidentiality agreements, they both testified at trial that they had, in fact, orally agreed not to disclose the meeting's contents.The Court finds that Dones and Woolhouse entered into an oral agreement with Raniere to keep the April 2009 meeting confidential.

Despite Dones verbally agreeing to confidentiality in an April 2009 meeting with Raniere over staff grievances, when the meeting did not go as Dones and company planned, the "NXIVM 9" as there were later known, emailed an EXTORTION letter to Keith Raniere and Nancy Salzman:

we believe we can no longer continue a business relationship with ESP/NXIVM. Therefore, we are requesting the closure of outstanding value exchanges not met as well as the buyout for the Tacoma center for the [email signatories].
We are requesting a response to this letter by 11:59 PM, Saturday, April 25, 2009. We are requesting a written, signed, notarized contract agreement to the below amounts by 11:59 PM, Sunday, April 26, 2009. We are requesting a Cashier's Check for the total amount due of $2,088,000 by Thursday, April 30, 2009. If these requests are not met we will move forward by contacting the Press.

After Dones and company's extortion letter did not pay off, Susan Dones EDITED/isolated a few seconds from one of the videos Dones'girlfriend Kim Woolhouse recorded during the 2009 meeting, making it sound as though Keith Raniere has had people "killed":

the evidence was clear that Dones circulated a link to an excerpt from the 2009 Video despite orally agreeing to keep the 2009 meeting with Raniere confidential.Dones sent an email to multiple individuals on October 21, 2010, which included the link to the video excerpt and stated: "[t]his video is intended for you only and I trust you will keep it's [sic] location safe. Here is the link."She claimed to have been motivated by a fear for her own personal safety, and by a concern that she would be an "accessory after the fact" with respect to NXIVM's alleged crimes. She labeled herself as a "whistleblower" dedicated to exposing the truth about NXIVM. The Court does not find Dones' motivation and justifications credible under the circumstances.The Court also finds there is a risk that Dones would further circulate the 2009 Video if she is not enjoined, her oral agreement notwithstanding.

In Parlato's Lost Women we see this same snippet of video seeming to say Raniere has had people killed, despite court documents a decade before (after seeing a fuller context for Raniere's statement) declaring the video confidential/proprietary and concerned that Dones would continue unjustly/immorally and vengefully circulating the video's out of context snippet, and once Raniere was jailed, Susan Dones did just that, with Frank Parlato's help.

From a sworn deposition by Susan Dones regarding aforementioned video tape:

Question: And what portion of the video tape did you single out for putting on YouTube?

Susan Dones:The only-- the only thing that I did put on YouTube, which is under a private link-- the only way anybody would know about that is to have that link. It's not like it is a public video-- is the part where Keith Raniere mentions that people have died for his beliefs and that he has had people killed for his beliefs.

Question:And did you know at the time when he was talking about people dying for him and people being killed for him related to the documentary that was being filmed in Mexico?

Susan Dones: My understanding--I didn't know about--I knew about the documentary in Mexico. I'd never seen that, but when he said "I have had people killed for my beliefs," that scared me.

Question: Well, you were there when he said that; correct?

Susan Dones: No, I wasn't at that meeting.

Question: All right. Did you know that when Mr. Raniere stated that people--that he had people killed because of his beliefs that he was talking about the consequences of a documentary that was filmed in Mexico when a member of the LeBaron family was killed by drug lords in the middle of the documentary by Mark Vicente?

Susan Dones:No, sir.

Question: No. Have you ever--did you know that Mark Vicente was filming a documentary of the LeBaron family in Mexico?

Susan Dones: I knew he was filming a documentary. I didn't know what it was about.

Question: Did you know Benjamin Le Baron was murdered by cartel members in the middle of the documentary?

Susan Dones: No, sir.

Question: Did you know that the documentary documents Keith's apparent advice to the family to avoid paying ransom?

Susan Dones: No, Sir.

Question: And did you know that the documentary says that the family decided not to pay ransom and their son was released, and then the father was killed for not paying ransom?

Susan Dones: No, sir.

Question: You've never heard Keith say something like"And I feel like I'm responsible for that. I've had people killed for my beliefs"?

Susan Dones: No, sir.I spent very little time with Keith in my time in NXIVM. (This is NOT the impression given by Parlato or Dones the in Lost Women, in fact it is a complete contradiction.)

To be clear, we do not side with or support in any way Keith Raniere and company, we are merely shining a spotlight on Susan Dones'shady, unscrupulous and SELF-SERVING behaviour!

When questioned in this same deposition regarding the years Dones opened and ran her Tacoma ESP/NXIVM center Dones answers:

You know, I'm not sure when we opened. Yeah. I don't know our start date. 2003, 2004. It was during the summer, but I don't know for sure what year. It could have been 2005. I don't really know that. And then we -- then I closed in April of 2009.

When questioned about the years Dones ran the two location centers for ESP/NXIVM in Washington Dones states:

It could have been--it might have been a little bit longer. Five--five years.

Yet at 22:50 mins into the Lost Women video Frank Parlato states:

I'm here to meet up with Susan Dones. For eight years of her life, she was a head trainer for NXIVM in Tacoma, Washington.

Did Parlato pull 8 years out of his ass? Did Dones lie/exaggerate her importance/position within ESP/NXIVM to Parlato? Are Parlato and Dones willful participants in the lies told on Lost Women for their joint personal grievances/agendas against Keith Raniere? Continuing in the Lost Women video after Parlato introduces Susan Dones:

Frank Parlato: Going back to January 2003. She was in Albany. You absolutely saw her.

Susan Dones:Yeah. Oh yeah. Yeah. And we chatted. She wanted to see the Albany center.

In Dones' 2010 deposition she could not remember 5 years previously when she opened her own ESP/NXIVM center, yet in 2019 (nearly two decades after Kristin Snyder disappeared) we are expected to believe Dones remembers specific details about months, years, places, moods and conversations with a virtual stranger? Moving on in the Lost Women video:

Frank Parlato: Did she ever meet Keith Raniere, and could you've done that, do you think?

Susan Dones:Yeah, absolutely. My suspicion is, is that he might have even had sex with her. The other thing is that Keith did not like women being lesbians.

Frank Parlato: He did not like women being lesbians?

Susan Dones: No, being gay, period, was an act of defiance, especially if you're a woman, it was an act of defiance, and I think, for him, because he treated women as objects. If you're a lesbian, then you're not available to him. So, could he possibly try to turn her. You know, it's kind of like a notch on his belt. If she was manipulated somehow into having some kind of sexual relationship with him, we know that this is a guy that will do evil things to women.

Before we comment on this, lets take a look back at Susan Dones 2010 deposition regarding lesbians, Dones is asked:

Question:Has Keith ever come on to you?

Susan Dones:He knows I'm a lesbian, so he wouldn't do that.

Question: Has he ever slept with you?

Susan Dones:No.

Question:Has he ever tried to manipulate you sexually?

Susan Dones:No.

By the time, this deposition (2010) was taken, Susan Dones was through working for Keith Raniere, and to public knowledge never worked for Keith Raniere again. So, under a sworn LEGAL statement Dones claimed Keith Raniere would not come on to her BECAUSE he knew she was a lesbian. Yet in 2019 when Raniere is safely behind bars and Dones has no legal perjury threat, Raniere is suddenly a sex starved sadist out to rape all lesbians in his flock (while simultaneously, according to Parlato/Dones, maintaining his celibate monk-like status). But frankly, we really do not care what lies Dones chooses to tell about Raniere, what WE do care about are the LIES Dones has stated and/or co-signed on regarding Kristin Snyder! Dones does not answer Parlato when asked IF Kristin COULD have met Raniere, she merely states Kristin MIGHT have had SEX with him! She might have run for president, she might have walked on the moon, she might have realised LARGE sums of monies were removed from her business! MIGHT, does NOT mean DID!

Before continuing let's take a step back to what Dones tells Parlato in the Lost Women video, she says:

"...being gay, period, was an act of defiance, especially if you're a woman"

While this may read like Radical Feminism 101, keep in mind this is not Kate Millet talking, this is not Sheila Jeffreys talking (although it might as well be), it is Susan Dones! The Susan Dones who is Frank Parlato's resident LESBIAN expert, for whom Homosexuality is something you DO rather than something you innately ARE, and something Kristin Snyder most CERTAINLY was. Dones then states:

"If you're a lesbian, then you're not available to him."

Is Dones suggesting that by taking an ESP course, class participants must avow sexual availability to Keith Raniere? Dones says in her deposition that Keith had sex with many of the women in his inner circle, but that Keith never made sexual advances toward her BECAUSE she is a lesbian. Parlato has tried to claim Raniere touted himself as a sexless god/guru/monk, although Keith Raniere has stated in interviews that he was "honest about the fact that he was polyamorous"; it is through that claim that Frank Parlato cites as a reason Raniere might (there’s that word again)have wanted to murder Kristin Snyder. According to Parlato's delusional drivel, Raniere might have wanted to cover up Kristin's alleged pregnancy in effort to maintain the Parlato-imagined celibate monk facade.

If you missed the Lost Women video, per Parlato: Kristin flew from Alaska to Albany (which have discovered is NOT entirely true). Kristin meets her dream man Keith. Keith then beds (rapes?) Kristin. Kristin becomes pregnant. Kristin flies back to Anchorage with her pregnant self and takes her second ESP class (after being coerced at best or raped at worst, why not give your rapist $6000 more dollars or more of your hard-earned money). CATHOLIC, pregnant, cheating, lesbian Kristin cannot keep her shit together and flips out once back at home with her lesbian lover Heidi, and then many times being literally thrown out/drug out of the ESP class she had taken with lesbian lover Heidi. CATHOLIC, pregnant, cheating, lesbian Kristin was yelling at the top of her lungs that she was pregnant with Keith's baby. Evidently these ESP people could not keep CATHOLIC, pregnant, cheating, lesbian Kristin out of their private rented hotel room! Have they never heard of SECURITY! CATHOLIC, pregnant, cheating, lesbian Kristin then gets fed up, leaves at varying times from the class (depending on which version of the story is being told), and at some point in a fit of a psychotic break, drives several hours in the dark wearing what amounts to clown attire (per Heidi), STEALS a kayak and paddles into oblivion, or alternatively (depending on which version of the story Frank is telling), is somehow kidnapped/murdered by a sex cult! All because, according to Parlato, CATHOLIC, pregnant, cheating, lesbian Kristin would never have an abortion due to her deep Catholicism. Despite the fact that Kristin was an agnostic leaning heavily toward atheism, married to another woman, and was a Gold Star!

We want also to address this piece of the Parlato/Dones Lost Women exchange:

Dones claims Kristin Snyder (who took only a couple ESP classes) could certainly have met AND bedded Raniere in Albany NY. Parlato specifies the month he claims Kristin was in Albany NY:

Per Heidi Clifford from a 2004 interview she stated that:

"Kristin Snyder visited ESP headquarters in Halfmoon for several days in January 2003"

In the Lost Women interview Heidi Clifford states:

"I thinkif she came home from New York in December or January" (Apparently she had no idea where her wife was for several months-why???)

Kristin's parents state in 2004 that

"Kristin Snyder visited the family's 300-acre cotton farm a few weeks after her first intensive"

in November 2002, which would be about the second or third week in December.

Frank Parlato stated in a 2017 blog post that:

"Snyder visited her parents, Robert and Jonnie Snyder, at their farm in Dillon, S.C. for Christmas".

Clearly there are some serious discrepancies in the varying accounts of the last few months prior to Kristin's disappearance, specifically by those who actually saw Kristin and LIVED with Kristin! As this post is meant to focus on the lavish lies and inordinately inconsistent narratives of Susan Dones, we will refrain from including the particulars of Kristin's last weeks which clearly dispel the shit the Parlato/Dones duo shoveled in Lost Women and elsewhere. Susan Dones made no bones about her unhinged vengeful anger (I love that we are a bug up their ass) toward Raniere. Dones, like Parlato, is not interested in what actually happened to Kris/or correcting the distorted lies about Kris's character, Susan Dones is ONLY invested in getting back at Keith Raniere! In the meantime, if anyone has any information or would like to join myself, Mrs Dirt and our small but growing network invested in seeking truth and justice for Kristin Snyder, please email us at Justice4Kristin@mail.com

Untill next time...

↧

Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 4

November 2, 2020, 2:08 pm

≪ Previous: Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 3

Next up in our series on the The Lost Women of NXIVM mockumentary is Joseph O’Hara of Albany, NY. O'Hara was an attorney who worked for NXIVM from October 2003 until he "quit" in January 2005.

O'Hara claimed he quit working for NXIVM because of their nefarious doings and deeds, but it is clear Joe quit because of HIS own nefarious doings:

Seems Joe took a page from Parlato's book and he too tried to steal from the Bronfmans; just one of a multitude of tidbits that doesnt exactly inspire confidence in O'Hara's feedback on NXIVM/Lost Women.

From Lost Women, the gist of the interaction between Parlato and O'Hara:

Keith Raniere and company clearly didnt do anything regarding Kristin Snyder's disappearance at the time, because until the (agenda based, strange quotes and shoddy) Dennis Yusko article appeared in February 2004, Raniere and company didnt know they were being blamed for her disappearance. Snyder's parents (seeing dollar signs) boasted at Kristin's memorial, that they were going to "sue" ESP, as well as take/sell Kristin's truck. Obviously they did not have any grounds to sue, nor did they receive Kristin's truck, despite Heidi Clifford agreeing publicly that they would. The Yusko article was a last ditch effort by Snyder's parents to conjure up some sort of motive (where none existed) to get money from ESP/KR, NOT info/justice for their daughter.

What we have learned about KR between 2003 and 2019 is that he was notoriously litigious, he would kill his believed enemies...in court! As every person that he believed crossed him found out one way or another!

Clearly Parlato either failed to follow O'Hara's advice, or he didnt like what he found (as can be seen in Lost Women when he goes to the Anchorage PD!) because none of it held up his wild inane speculations about Snyder's still open missing persons case in relation to Keith or ESP/NXIVM.

When Frank Parlato spoke to The Voice, for some reason Parlato hide behind the name Phil Robertson, according to depositions taken in the case....Robertson(Frank Parlato)also claimed that O’Hara is a corrupt lawyer who is sure to be eventually disbarred and accused him of embezzling $250,000 in NXIVM funds.

Interesting that Parlato apparently called out Joe O'Hara as a crook, yet includes O'Hara in Lost Women as if he is a trusted expert!

Oh look, Parlato was correct, O'Hara was in fact a crook whom the Feds took down for STEALING from mentally disabled children! Enemy of his enemy may be Parlato's friend, but he certainly is not any kind of expert on Kristin Snyder!

Until next time...

↧

Dear lesbians and bisexual women: we need to talk. There’s a problem for our community on the horizon that we need to address. The problem is this: we’re not doing enough to put money into lesbian projects.

Lesbians might not have much money compared to other demographics, but they can be very generous with what little they do have.

We can’t freeload on positive externalities forever.

My favorite city in the world is Paris, but Tanzania is the best vacation destination and Bangladesh will always be where my heart lies because of my time living there.